Three-year risk of cervical precancer and cancer after the detection of low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes targeted by a commercial test.
Three-year risk of cervical precancer and cancer after the detection of low-risk human papillomavirus genotypes targeted by a commercial test.
复制标题
商业测试检测到低风险人乳头瘤病毒基因型后,宫颈癌前病变和癌症的三年风险。
DOI:
10.1097/aog.0000000000000013
复制
发表时间:
2014
影响因子:
7.2
通讯作者:
NewMexicoHPVPapRegistrySteeringCommittee
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Castle,PhilipE;Hunt,WilliamC;Langsfeld,Erika;Wheeler,CosetteM;NewMexicoHPVPapRegistrySteeringCommittee
OBJECTIVE:To investigate the risk of cervical precancer and cancer associated with detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) 6, 11, and 42.METHODS:We used data from the New Mexico Human Papillomavirus Pap Registry. A stratified sample of 59,644 residual cervical cytology specimens from a population of 379,000 underwent HPV genotyping. We measured the 3-year cumulative incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more severe (CIN 2+) and grade 3 or more severe (CIN 3+) after detection of single HPV 6, 11, or 42 infections or single or multiple infections of HPV 6, 11, or 42 (“HPV 6, 11, 42, or combinations”; n= 581).RESULTS:The overall prevalence of a single infection of HPV 6, 11, or 42 was 0.8%(95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7–0.9%). The 3-year risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ after HPV 6, 11, 42, or combinations infections (n= 581) were 0.4%(CI 0.1–0.7%) for CIN 2+ and 0.0% for CIN 3+(nota bene, no CI was calculable because no events occurred), respectively. By comparison, the 3-year risks of CIN 2+ and CIN 3+ after a negative HPV result (n= 27,522) were 0.2%(95% CI 0.1–0.2%) and 0.1%(95% CI 0.0–0.1%), respectively.CONCLUSION:Detection of HPV 6, 11, 42, or combinations in the absence of high-risk HPV types does not identify women at increased 3-year risk for cervical precancer. Testing for HPV 6, 11, 42, or combinations of those types should be discontinued because it has no proven benefit to patients.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE:IIHuman papillomavirus 6, 11, and 42 testing does not meaningfully predict the development of cervical precancer and therefore should not be included in cervical cancer screening.