Social and Contextual Influences on Antibiotic Prescribing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Study with Clinical Commissioning Group and General Practice Professionals.
Social and Contextual Influences on Antibiotic Prescribing and Antimicrobial Stewardship: A Qualitative Study with Clinical Commissioning Group and General Practice Professionals.
复制标题
DOI：
10.3390/antibiotics9120859
复制
发表时间：
2020-12-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
On Behalf Of The Step-Up Study Team
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Borek AJ;Anthierens S;Allison R;Mcnulty CAM;Anyanwu PE;Costelloe C;Walker AS;Butler CC;Tonkin-Crine S;On Behalf Of The Step-Up Study Team
Antibiotic prescribing in England varies considerably between Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) and general practices. We aimed to assess social and contextual factors affecting antibiotic prescribing and engagement with antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) initiatives. Semi-structured telephone interviews were conducted with 22 CCG professionals and 19 general practice professionals. Interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically. Social/contextual influences were grouped into the following four categories: (1) Immediate context, i.e., patients’ social characteristics (e.g., deprivation and culture), clinical factors, and practice and clinician characteristics (e.g., “struggling” with staff shortage/turnover) were linked to higher prescribing. (2) Wider context, i.e., pressures on the healthcare system, limited resources, and competing priorities were seen to reduce engagement with AMS. (3) Collaborative and whole system approaches, i.e., communication, multidisciplinary networks, leadership, and teamwork facilitated prioritizing AMS, learning, and consistency. (4) Relativity of appropriate prescribing, i.e., “high” or “appropriate” prescribing was perceived as relative, depending on comparators, and disregarding different contexts, but social norms around antibiotic use among professionals and patients seemed to be changing. Further optimization of antibiotic prescribing would benefit from addressing social/contextual factors and addressing wider health inequalities, not only targeting individual clinicians. Tailoring and adapting to local contexts and constraints, ensuring adequate time and resources for AMS, and collaborative, whole system approaches to promote consistency may help promote AMS.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子：
2.1
作者：
Hoye, Sigurd;Braend, Anja Maria;Spehar, Ivan
通讯作者：
Spehar, Ivan
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Palin, Victoria;Molter, Anna;van Staa, Tjeerd
通讯作者：
van Staa, Tjeerd
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Borek, Aleksandra J.;Anthierens, Sibyl;Tonkin-Crine, Sarah
通讯作者：
Tonkin-Crine, Sarah
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Adekanmbi, Victor;Jones, Hywel;Francis, Nick A.
通讯作者：
Francis, Nick A.
影响因子：
5.2
作者：
Dolk, F. Christiaan K.;Pouwels, Koen B.;Smieszek, Timo
通讯作者：
Smieszek, Timo