State implementation of evidence-based practice for youths, Part I: Responses to the state of the evidence
State implementation of evidence-based practice for youths, Part I: Responses to the state of the evidence
复制标题
DOI：
10.1097/chi.0b013e31816485f4
复制
发表时间：
2008-04-01
影响因子：
13.3
通讯作者：
Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Bruns, Eric J.;Hoagwood, Kimberly Eaton
两名儿童和青少年精神病学部门主任在州立医学院在美国的相对海岸。美国也面临着类似的机遇。其中一人被州精神卫生主任要求共同主持一个以证据为基础的实践小组委员会，这是改善全州儿童和青少年精神卫生保健的更大努力的一部分。另一位立法者与另一位立法者进行了接触，他对如何制定立法以改善该州有严重心理健康问题的青少年的结果感兴趣。两位学者都认为，更系统地应用循证实践将有助于提高各自州儿童及其家庭的生活质量，并召集不同的团队集思广益，提出建议。但一旦召开会议，两个团队都很难找到开展此类举措的最佳实践范例。第一个州的循证实践小组委员会的一名成员问联合主席，“关于如何使用证据的证据在哪里？".
Two child and adolescent psychiatry division directors in state medical schools on opposite coasts of the. United States are faced with similar opportunities. One has been asked by the state mental health director to co-chair an evidence-based practice subcommittee, part of a larger effort to improve mental health care for children and adolescents statewide. The other has been approached by a legislator interested in ideas on how to craft legislation that can improve outcomes for youths in the state with serious mental health concerns. Both academics believe that more systematic application of evidence-based practices will contribute to better quality of life for children and their families in their respective states, and each convenes diverse teams to brainstorm options and make recommendations. But once convened, both teams struggle to find examples of best practices for undertaking such an initiative. One member of the first state's evidence-based practice subcommittee asks the co-chair, "Where's the evidence on how to use the evidence?".