Japanese Zen Schools and the Transition to Meiji A Plurality of Responses in the Nineteenth Century

Japanese Zen Schools and the Transition to Meiji A Plurality of Responses in the Nineteenth Century
复制标题

日本禅宗与明治时期的过渡 十九世纪的多种反应

DOI:
10.18874/jjrs.25.1-2.1998.167-213
复制
发表时间:
1998
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Michel Mohr
Michel Mohr
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Michel Mohr

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

这篇文章仔细考察了与三大禅宗传统有关的物种≥c≥gures f≥的生活;它提供了关于他们从德川时代末期到明治时代第一个几十年的活动的大量信息。令人惊讶的是,政治结构的变化以及随之而来的经济或社会变革并没有从根本上改变这些佛教徒对各自遗产的理解。≥的社会压力促使他们更加重视对平民的教育,他们分享了给予非专业支持者更多重视的全球趋势。然而,他们的教义内容似乎主要反映了本文所说的德川和明治时代之间的“笼罩的连续性”。这里考察的教师和门外汉也说明了明治佛教的多样性,尽管新政府努力将所有佛教机构集中在一起;他们进一步证明了不同传统代表之间的相互影响往往超出了Arti≥社会宗派的界限。
This article scrutinizes the lives of speci≥c ≥gures af≥liated with the three main Zen traditions; it presents ≥rsthand information on their activities from the end of the Tokugawa period through the ≥rst decades of the Meiji era. Changes in the political structure and the ensuing economic or social transformations surprisingly did not fundamentally alter the way these Buddhists apprehended their respective legacies. Of≥cial pressure encouraged them to put more emphasis on the education of commoners and they shared the global trend to give more importance to lay supporters. The content of their teachings, however, primarily appears to reflect what this paper calls “the shrouded continuity” between the Tokugawa and Meiji eras. The teachers and laypersons examined here also illustrate the diversity that pervaded Meiji Buddhism despite the new government’s efforts to centralize all Buddhist institutions; they further bear testimony to the fact that the mutual influence among representatives of different traditions often went beyond arti≥cial sectarian boundaries.