Regression-contingent analyses: A reply to Altmann
Regression-contingent analyses: A reply to Altmann
复制标题
回归偶然分析：对 Altmann 的答复
DOI：
10.3758/bf03200857
复制
发表时间：
1994
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Sara C. Serene
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
K. Rayner;Sara C. Serene
我们讨论了阿尔特曼(这一问题)对我们关于回归条件分析的使用的评论的答复中的三点。首先，我们再次论证了Altmann，Garnham和Dennis(1992)的论文给人的印象是，眼动是读者在花园小路上的一个必要指标。其次，我们承认先前发表的关于句法分析策略的研究之间的差异既可能是由于刺激的结构性差异，也可能是因为记忆广度的差异或不同的阅读策略。第三，我们认为研究人员应该检查大量可以从眼动记录中获得的可能的依赖测量。
We discuss three points from Altmann's (this issue) reply to our comment on the use of the regression contingent analysis. First, we again argue that the Altmann, Garnham, and Dennis (1992) paper leaves the impression that eye movements are a necessary index of readers being garden pathed Second, we acknowledge that differences among previously published studies dealing with parsing strategies are as likely to be due to structural differences in the stimuli as they are to memory span differences or different reading strategies. Third, we argue that researchers should examine a large number of possible dependent measures that are obtainable from the eye movement record.