Personality-Related Risk and Resilience Factors in Coping with Daily Stress among Adult Cancer Patients.
Personality-Related Risk and Resilience Factors in Coping with Daily Stress among Adult Cancer Patients.
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/15427609.2013.760259
复制
发表时间：
2013-01-01
影响因子：
2.4
通讯作者：
Hay EL
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Diehl M;Hay EL
我们采用日记设计来研究成年癌症患者应对日常压力的个性相关风险和弹性因素。我们把个体的自我概念不连贯（SCI）作为人格相关的风险因素，把心理健康（PWB）作为基线和日常控制信念作为弹性因素。对日常压力的反应性以消极的日常情绪进行评估。多水平建模分析产生了显着的主要影响，日常压力，PWB在基线，和日常控制。这些主效应通过显著的双向和三向相互作用进行了限定。显着的压力X控制的相互作用表明，个人报告更多的负面情绪，以应对日常压力低控制的日子相比，高控制的日子。同样，一个显着的SCI X控制互动表明，个人与一个更连贯的自我概念受益更多的感觉在控制方面的经验较少增加的负面情绪相比，个人与一个更不连贯的自我概念。显着的三向相互作用也表明，压力，控制和消极的日常情绪之间的关联不同的SCI和PWB的水平在研究开始时。总的来说，这项研究的结果显示了风险和弹性因素与受危及生命的疾病影响的成年人样本中的日常情绪健康之间的复杂关联。
We employed a diary design to study personality-related risk and resilience factors in adult cancer patients coping with daily stress. We focused on individuals’ self-concept incoherence (SCI) as a personality-related risk factor and on psychological well-being (PWB) at baseline and daily beliefs of control as resilience factors. Reactivity to daily stress was assessed in terms of negative daily mood. Multilevel modeling analyses yielded significant main effects of daily stress, PWB at baseline, and daily control. These main effects were qualified by significant two- and three-way interactions. The significant Stress X Control interaction indicated that individuals reported more negative mood in response to daily stress on low-control days compared to high-control days. Similarly, a significant SCI X Control interaction suggested that individuals with a more coherent self-concept benefited more from feeling in control in terms of experiencing less increase in negative mood compared to individuals with a more incoherent self-concept. Significant three-way interactions also indicated that the associations between stress, control and negative daily mood differed by level of SCI and level of PWB at the beginning of the study. Overall, the findings from this study show the complex associations between risk and resilience factors and daily emotional well-being in a sample of adults who were affected by a life-threatening illness.