The Self-Organization of Human Interaction
The Self-Organization of Human Interaction
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/b978-0-12-407187-2.00002-2
复制
发表时间：
2013-01-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Richardson, Daniel C.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Dale, Rick;Fusaroli, Riccardo;Richardson, Daniel C.
我们描述了一个“蜈蚣的困境”，面临人类互动的科学。关于人类互动的研究一直存在广泛的理论争论，尽管绝大多数研究倾向于关注一小部分人类行为，认知过程和互动环境。问题是，自然主义的人类互动必须同时整合所有这些因素，而更宏大的理论缓解不能只来自集中的实验或计算议程。我们期待动力系统理论作为一个框架，思考如何将这些多种行为，过程和背景整合到一个更广泛的人类互动的帐户。通过引入和利用自组织和协同作用的基本概念，我们回顾了实证工作，显示了人类的互动是如何灵活和自适应的，并在展开的互动任务，如对话，或更集中的目标为基础的背景下，逐步结构本身。最后，我们承认，动力系统帐户是非常短的具体模型，我们简要描述的方法，理论框架可以被整合，而不是无休止的争议，以取得一些成功的蜈蚣的困境，人类的互动。
We describe a "centipede's dilemma" that faces the sciences of human interaction. Research on human interaction has been involved in extensive theoretical debate, although the vast majority of research tends to focus on a small set of human behaviors, cognitive processes, and interactive contexts. The problem is that naturalistic human interaction must integrate all of these factors simultaneously, and grander theoretical mitigation cannot come only from focused experimental or computational agendas. We look to dynamical systems theory as a framework for thinking about how these multiple behaviors, processes, and contexts can be integrated into a broader account of human interaction. By introducing and utilizing basic concepts of self-organization and synergy, we review empirical work that shows how human interaction is flexible and adaptive and structures itself incrementally during unfolding interactive tasks, such as conversation, or more focused goal-based contexts. We end on acknowledging that dynamical systems accounts are very short on concrete models, and we briefly describe ways that theoretical frameworks could be integrated, rather than endlessly disputed, to achieve some success on the centipede's dilemma of human interaction.