RECOGNITION MEMORY FOR TYPICAL AND UNUSUAL FACES

RECOGNITION MEMORY FOR TYPICAL AND UNUSUAL FACES
复制标题

DOI:
10.1037/0278-7393.5.3.212
复制
发表时间:
1979-01-01
期刊:
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN LEARNING AND MEMORY
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
HOLLANDER, S
HOLLANDER, S
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
LIGHT, LL;KAYRASTUART, F;HOLLANDER, S

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

总共 219 名男性参与的 5 项实验中的第一项验证了 M. Going 和 J. Read(参见记录 1976-21716-001)以及 M. Cohen 和 W. Carr(参见记录 1976-06144-001)研究的可靠性,使用了面部已被明确评定为典型性的男性高中生照片。实验 III 和 IV 检验了这样的假设:典型性效应是由于典型和异常面孔的处理深度不同造成的。在实验 I-IV 中,人们发现,对于被评为与原型相似的面孔的识别记忆,不如对被评为外表不寻常的面孔的记忆。该结果是在偶然和有意学习条件下获得的,呈现速度为 3 至 15 秒,保留间隔为 3 至 24 小时。实验V建立了项目间相似性作为识别记忆中这种典型性效应的结构基础。讨论了根据当前的一些分类学习模型、处理深度模型或词频效应模型解释研究结果的困难。(43 参考)(PsycINFO 数据库记录 (c) 2016 APA,保留所有权利)
The 1st of 5 experiments with a total of 219 males verified the reliability of studies by M. Going and J. Read (see record 1976-21716-001) and by M. Cohen and W. Carr (see record 1976-06144-001) using pictures of male high school seniors whose faces had been explicitly rated as to typicality. Exps III and IV examined the hypothesis that the typicality effect is due to differential depth of processing of typical and unusual faces. In Exps I–IV, recognition memory for faces rated as similar to a prototype was found to be inferior to memory for faces rated as unusual in appearance. This result was obtained under both incidental and intentional learning conditions, at presentation rates ranging from 3 to 15 sec, and with retention intervals from 3 to 24 hrs. Exp V established interitem similarity as the structural basis of this typicality effect in recognition memory. Difficulties in interpreting the findings in terms of some current models for classification learning, depth of processing models, or present models of the word frequency effect are discussed.(43 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)