Evaluation of MOS social support in low-income caregivers of African American children with poorly controlled asthma.

Evaluation of MOS social support in low-income caregivers of African American children with poorly controlled asthma.
复制标题

哮喘控制不佳的非洲裔美国儿童的低收入照顾者的 MOS 社会支持评估。

DOI:
10.1080/02770903.2018.1510504
复制
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
The Journal of asthma : official journal of the Association for the Care of Asthma
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Butz,Arlene
Butz,Arlene
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Margolis,Rachel;Bellin,MelissaH;Sacco,Paul;Harrington,Donna;Butz,Arlene

文献摘要

相似文献

目的:本研究的目的是检查的因素结构的医疗结果研究社会支持调查(MOS-SSS)在低收入,城市照顾者的非裔美国儿童哮喘控制不佳的样本。虽然MOS-SSS是一种常用的措施,社会支持,其心理测量特性还没有被研究,在此population.Methods:验证性因素分析进行,以确定最合适的因素结构的MOS-SSS的照顾者的非裔美国儿童,经常急诊室访问不受控制的哮喘。以下模型进行了测试和比较,使用已建立的拟合统计:一个18项的二阶四因素模型,一个18项的四因素模型,一个双因素模型和一个18项的一因素模型与嵌套models.Results:参与照顾者是单身(75.6%)和女性(97%)。与其他测试模型相比,该量表的18项单因素版本具有最佳拟合统计量:(142)= 308.319,p> 0.001;近似均方根误差(RMSEA)= 0.077; CFI(比较拟合指数)= 0.990; Tucker-Lewis指数(TLI)= 0.988。最终的MOS-SSS模型与照顾者抑郁症状之间存在统计学显著负相关(= − 0.374,p < 0.001),支持结构效度。结论:18项单因素MOS-SSS可能适用于控制不佳的非裔美国儿童照顾者的研究和临床实践。它似乎有希望作为一种机制,以促进了解社会支持和哮喘的结果之间的关系,在这个脆弱的人群。
Objective:The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SSS) in a sample of low-income, urban caregivers of African American children with poorly controlled asthma. Although the MOS-SSS is a commonly used measure of social support, its psychometric properties have not been studied in this population.Methods:Confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to determine the most appropriate factor structure for the MOS-SSS in caregivers of African American children with frequent Emergency Department visits for uncontrolled asthma. The following models were tested and compared using established fit statistics: an 18-item second-order four factor model, an 18-item four factor model, a bifactor model and an 18-item one factor model with nested models.Results:Participating caregivers were single (75.6%) and female (97%). An 18-item one factor version of the scale had the best fit statistics compared to the other models tested:(142) = 308.319,p> 0.001; Root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.077; CFI (Comparative Fit Index) = 0.990; and Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI) = 0.988. Construct validity was supported by a statistically significant negative relationship between our final MOS-SSS model and caregiver depressive symptoms (= −0.374,p< 0.001).Conclusions:The 18-item one factor MOS-SSS may be appropriate for use in research and clinical practice with caregivers of African American children with poorly controlled asthma. It appears promising as a mechanism to advance understanding of relationships between social support and asthma outcomes in this vulnerable population.