DIFFERENT DIFFICULTY MANIPULATIONS INTERACT DIFFERENTLY WITH TASK EMPHASIS - EVIDENCE FOR MULTIPLE RESOURCES
DIFFERENT DIFFICULTY MANIPULATIONS INTERACT DIFFERENTLY WITH TASK EMPHASIS - EVIDENCE FOR MULTIPLE RESOURCES
复制标题
DOI：
10.1037/0096-1523.8.1.146
复制
发表时间：
1982-01-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
NAVON, D
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
GOPHER, D;BRICKNER, M;NAVON, D
为了测试多资源的概念，一个二维的追求跟踪任务配对的字母打字任务，其难度是由不同的认知和运动因素操纵，被管理到6个右撇子男性（19-25岁）。任务优先级的改变对两个任务的性能有很大的影响，这表明它们竞争资源。这两种类型的打字难度操纵影响打字性能，但只有运动困难与优先级。结果解释表明，在联合性能，打字和跟踪竞争主要是电机相关的，但不是认知资源。与多资源的概念相一致，打字任务被认为至少需要2种资源。(14参考）（PsycINFO数据库记录（c）2016阿帕，保留所有权利）
To test the notion of multiple resources, a 2-dimensional pursuit tracking task paired with a letter-typing task, the difficulty of which was manipulated by varying cognitive and motor factors, was administered to 6 right-handed males (19–25 yrs old). The manipulation of task priority had a large effect on the performance of the 2 tasks, which indicates that they compete for resources. Both types of typing difficulty manipulations affected typing performance, but only motor difficulty interacted with priorities. Results are interpreted to indicate that in joint performance, typing and tracking compete mainly for motor-related but not for cognitive resources. Consistent with the multiple resources concept, the letter-typing task is argued to require at least 2 kinds of resources.(14 ref)(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)