Growth and Mortality as Causes of Variation in Metabolic Scaling Among Taxa and Taxonomic Levels
Growth and Mortality as Causes of Variation in Metabolic Scaling Among Taxa and Taxonomic Levels
复制标题
生长和死亡率是类群和分类水平之间代谢规模变化的原因
DOI:
10.1093/icb/icac038
复制
发表时间:
2022
影响因子:
2.6
通讯作者:
Norin, Tommy
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Norin, Tommy
Metabolic rate (MR) usually changes (scales) out of proportion to body mass (BM) as MR =aBMb, whereais a normalisation constant andbis the scaling exponent that reflects how steep this change is. This scaling relationship is fundamental to biology, but over a century of research has provided little consensus on the value ofb, and why it appears to vary among taxa and taxonomic levels. By analysing published data on fish and taking an individual-based approach to metabolic scaling, I show that variation in growth of fish under naturally restricted food availability can explain variation in within-individual (ontogenetic)bfor standard (maintenance) metabolic rate (SMR) of brown trout (Salmo trutta), with the fastest growers having the steepest metabolic scaling (b≈ 1). Moreover, I show that within-individualbcan vary much more widely than previously assumed from work on different individuals or different species, from –1 to 1 for SMR among individual brown trout. The negative scaling of SMR for some individuals was caused by reductions in metabolic rate in a food limited environment, likely to maintain positive growth. This resulted in a mean within-individualbfor SMR that was significantly lower than the across-individual (“static”)b, a difference that also existed for another species, cunner (Tautogolabrus adspersus). Interestingly, the wide variation in ontogeneticbfor SMR among individual brown trout did not exist for maximum (active) metabolic rate (MMR) of the same fish, showing that these two key metabolic traits (SMR and MMR) can scale independently of one another. I also show that across-species (“evolutionary”)bfor SMR of 134 fishes is significantly steeper (bapproaching 1) than the mean ontogeneticbfor the brown trout and cunner. Based on these interesting findings, I hypothesise that evolutionary and static metabolic scaling can be systematically different from ontogenetic scaling, and that the steeper evolutionary than ontogenetic scaling for fishes arises as a by-product of natural selection for fast-growing individuals with steep metabolic scaling (b≈ 1) early in life, where size-selective mortality is high for fishes. I support this by showing thatbfor SMR tends to increase with natural mortality rates of fish larvae within taxa.