A prospective randomized study comparing two techniques of bone augmentation: onlay graft alone or associated with a membrane
A prospective randomized study comparing two techniques of bone augmentation: onlay graft alone or associated with a membrane
复制标题
DOI：
10.1034/j.1600-0501.2001.120612.x
复制
发表时间：
2001-12-01
影响因子：
4.3
通讯作者：
Missika, P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Antoun, H;Sitbon, JM;Missika, P
先前已经描述了两种单独使用嵌体骨移植物或与不可吸收膜结合的牙槽嵴增高技术。这项前瞻性、随机研究在 6 个月时比较了这两种技术在无牙部位的骨增益、骨吸收和质量方面的情况。使用支架、卡尺和 Cr 扫描进行骨测量。放置 4 周后，一处发生膜暴露。骨内植入物已成功放置在所有移植部位。所有受试者的平均移植物厚度为 4.7 毫米（范围：2.3-6.2 毫米）。总体平均吸收为 1.5 毫米（范围：0-4.6 毫米），而总体平均宽度增益为 3.2 毫米（范围：0.8-6.2 毫米）。术后六个月，膜组的骨吸收明显少于单独移植物组（P
Two techniques of ridge augmentation using onlay bone graft alone or associated with a non-resorbable membrane have been previously described. This prospective, randomized study compared these two techniques at 6 months, in terms of bone gain, resorption and quality obtained at edentulous sites. Osseous measurements were taken using stents, callipers and Cr-scans. Membrane exposure occurred at one site, 4 weeks after placement. Endosseous implants were successfully placed at all grafted sites. The mean graft thickness for all subjects was 4.7 mm (range: 2.3-6.2 mm). Overall mean resorption was 1.5 mm (range: 0-4.6 mm) whereas overall mean width gain was 3.2 mm (range: 0.8-6.2 mm). Six months following surgery the membrane group experienced significantly less bone resorption than the graft alone group (P