On the internal phylogeny of East Bodish
On the internal phylogeny of East Bodish
复制标题
论东菩提的内部系统发育
DOI：
10.1017/9789382993285.005
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Gwendolyn Hyslop
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Gwendolyn Hyslop
“东Bodish”一词最早在Shafer（1954）中使用，以确定Dakpa（拉萨东南部的一种语言）所属的一个拟议的语言家族。Shafer（1954）指出，达巴语和“东博德语”与古典藏语密切相关，但不是直接起源于古典藏语。从那时起，其他几种语言被确定为东博德语。这些语言中的大多数都在不丹，但也有一些蔓延到西藏和阿鲁纳恰尔邦。东Bodish语言，一般来说，是所有藏缅语中描述最差的语言之一，特别是与其他Bodic表亲（如Newar，Kiranti语言，Tamang）相比。我熟悉的研究在§ 2中介绍。除了货车Driem（2007）显示Dakpa和Dzala之间的密切关系外，没有人试图整理东博迪语之间的关系。这篇文章的目的是提供新的数据，同时也提出了第一个尝试性的内部同源性之间的语言在东博迪什。在第2节中，我提供了东博迪语的相关背景，包括大致的位置和使用者人数。§ 3提供的数据和论据证实了货车Driem（2007）的分析，即Dakpa和Dzala在东Bodish内形成了一个亚群。第4节讨论了1我感谢宗卡发展委员会允许我进行这项研究，并感谢Karma Tshering在数据收集方面提供了宝贵的帮助。内森·希尔对本文的早期草稿提供了宝贵的反馈，我也感谢斯蒂芬·莫雷和匿名评论者的有益评论。我保留对任何错误的责任。
The term ‘East Bodish’was first used in Shafer (1954) to identify a proposed family of languages to which Dakpa, a language spoken Southeast of Lhasa, belonged. Shafer (1954) noted that Dakpa, and therefore ‘East Bodish’languages were closely related to, but not directly descended from Classical Tibetan. Since then, several other languages have been identified as East Bodish. A majority of these languages are found in Bhutan, but some spill over into Tibet and Arunachal Pradesh as well. The East Bodish languages, in general, are amongst the most poorly described in all of Tibeto-Burman, in particular in comparison to their other Bodic cousins (eg Newar, Kiranti languages, Tamang). The studies I am familiar with are presented in § 2. Other than van Driem (2007), showing the close relationship between Dakpa and Dzala, there has been no attempt to sort out the relationship amongst the East Bodish languages. The aim of this article is to make new data available while also proposing the first tentative internal phylogeny amongst the languages within East Bodish. In § 2 I provide the relevant background on East Bodish languages, including approximate location and number of speakers. § 3 presents the data and arguments that confirm van Driem (2007)’s analysis that Dakpa and Dzala form a subgroup within East Bodish. § 4 discusses the1 I am grateful to the Dzongkha Development Commission for permission to conduct this research and to Karma Tshering for invaluable assistance with data collection. Nathan Hill provided valuable feedback on an earlier draft of this paper and I am also grateful to Stephan Morey and and anonymous reviewer for their helpful comments. I retain responsiblities for any errors.