A state model of negative urgency: Do momentary reports of emotional impulsivity reflect global self-report?
A state model of negative urgency: Do momentary reports of emotional impulsivity reflect global self-report?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.jrp.2020.103942
复制
发表时间：
2020-06-01
影响因子：
3.3
通讯作者：
King, Kevin M.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Feil, Madison;Halvorson, Max;King, Kevin M.
消极紧迫感是一种特质，是一系列精神病理学的风险因素。然而，很少有研究测试消极紧迫感的全球自我报告措施是否真正反映了现实世界的消极情绪和冲动行为之间的高度关联。在10天内每天评估3次的年轻人样本（N = 222）中，我们测试了负面情绪是否与国家层面的冲动性的多个方面相关，以及这些关联是否受到负面紧迫感的全球自我报告的调节。我们的研究结果表明，消极情绪和冲动行为之间存在着强烈的内在联系。然而，消极紧迫感的整体自我报告并没有缓和我们测试的任何情绪冲动关联。(C)2020爱思唯尔公司All rights reserved.
Negative urgency is a trait that is a risk factor for a range of psychopathology. Yet, little research has tested whether global self-report measures of negative urgency truly reflect a heightened association between real-world negative emotions and impulsive behaviors. In a sample of young adults (N = 222) assessed 3 times per day for 10 days, we tested whether negative emotions were associated with multiple facets of impulsivity at the state-level, and whether those associations were moderated by global self-report of negative urgency. Our findings suggest a robust within-person association between negative affect and acting on impulse. However, global self-report of negative urgency did not moderate any emotion-impulsivity association we tested. (C) 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.