Peak growing season patterns and climate extremes-driven responses of gross primary production estimated by satellite and process based models over North America
Peak growing season patterns and climate extremes-driven responses of gross primary production estimated by satellite and process based models over North America
复制标题
通过卫星和基于过程的模型估算的北美地区初级生产总值的高峰生长季节模式和极端气候驱动的响应
DOI:
10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.108292
复制
发表时间:
2021-03
影响因子:
6.2
通讯作者:
Pierre Friedlingstein
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Wei He;Weimin Ju;Fei Jiang;Nicholas Parazoo;Pierre Gentine;Wu Xiaocui;Zhang Chunhua;Zhu Jiawen;Nicolas Viovy;Atul K. Jain;Stephen Sitch;Pierre Friedlingstein
Representations of the seasonal peak uptake of CO2and climate extremes effects have important implications for accurately estimating annual magnitude and inter-annual variations of terrestrial carbon fluxes, however the consistency of such representations among different satellite models and process-based (PB) models remain poorly known. Here we investigated these issues over North America based on a large ensemble of state-of-the-art gross primary production (GPP) models, including two solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF)-based models (WECANN and GOPT), three remote sensing driven light-use efficiency (LUE) models, and 10 PB models. We found that the two SIF-based GPP estimates were bilaterally consistent in spatial patterns of peak growing season GPP (GPPPGS; with the largest uptake at the Corn-Belt area in the United States) and climate extremes-driven responses. The simulations from three LUE models showed relatively consistent spatial patterns of GPPPGSand climate extremes-driven responses, which agreed well with SIF-based estimates and satellite based metrics. Obviously differed from SIF and LUE based estimates, the simulations from PB models exhibited noticeable divergences and mostly failed to reasonably replicate the spatial pattern of GPPPGS. In addition, satellite models and PB models were comparably able to capture the effects of climate extremes on GPP, but showing obvious divergences in the magnitude of impacts among different models, and the former outperformed the latter in locating GPP changes caused by climate extremes. We discussed the possible origins of such discrepancies in state-of-the-art models with focus on PB models. Improving the parameterizations of critical variables (e.g. leaf area index) and better characterizing environmental stresses could lead to more robust estimates of large-scale terrestrial GPP with PB models, thus serving for accurately assessing global carbon budget and better understanding the impacts of climate change on the terrestrial carbon cycle. Our study offers a baseline for improving large-scale estimation of terrestrial GPP.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Wang Xiaorong;Qiu Bo;Li Wenkai;Zhang Qian
通讯作者:
Zhang Qian
影响因子:
5.2
作者:
Gentine P;Alemohammad SH
通讯作者:
Alemohammad SH
影响因子:
9.8
作者:
Zhang Y;Xiao X;Wu X;Zhou S;Zhang G;Qin Y;Dong J
通讯作者:
Dong J
影响因子:
6.2
作者:
Sha Zhou;Yao Zhang;Kelly K. Caylor;Yiqi Luo;X. Xiao;P. Ciais;Yuefei Huang;Guangqian Wang
通讯作者:
Sha Zhou;Yao Zhang;Kelly K. Caylor;Yiqi Luo;X. Xiao;P. Ciais;Yuefei Huang;Guangqian Wang
影响因子:
4.9
作者:
Tramontana, Gianluca;Jung, Martin;Papale, Dario
通讯作者:
Papale, Dario