The Discursive Construction of National Identity
The Discursive Construction of National Identity
复制标题
国家认同的话语建构
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2009
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Unger
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
R. Wodak;R. D. Cillia;M. Reisigl;Karin Liebhart;A. Hirsch;R. Mitten;J. Unger
我们如何在话语中建构民族认同？在建构民族共性和独特性的同时，又运用了哪些主题、哪些话语策略和语言手段来建构与其他民族群体的差异性？《国家认同的话语建构》分析了欧洲国家认同的话语，特别关注奥地利。在批评话语分析的传统中，作者使用一种创新的跨学科方法，结合话语历史理论和方法以及政治学视角，分析了当前和正在进行的国家身份自我和他者定义的转变。因此，修辞促进民族认同和话语的建设和复制的民族国家内的公共，半公共和半私人的水平上的民族差异进行了详细的分析，并说明了大量的例子，从许多体裁（演讲，焦点小组，采访，媒体，等等）。除了对1995年各种纪念和庆祝活动所伴随的多种体裁进行批评性话语分析外，这一扩展和修订版还能够与2005年的类似活动进行比较。奥地利和欧洲联盟的社会政治变化的影响也在构建霸权国家身份的企图中变得透明。主要特点：* 话语历史的方法。* 跨学科（文化研究，话语分析，历史，政治学）。* 多方法、多体裁。* 定性案例研究。
How do we construct national identities in discourse? Which topics, which discursive strategies and which linguistic devices are employed to construct national sameness and uniqueness on the one hand, and differences to other national collectives on the other hand? The Discursive Construction of National Identity analyses discourses of national identity in Europe with particular attention to Austria. In the tradition of critical discourse analysis, the authors analyse current and on-going transformations in the self-and other definition of national identities using an innovative interdisciplinary approach which combines discourse-historical theory and methodology and political science perspectives. Thus, the rhetorical promotion of national identification and the discursive construction and reproduction of national difference on public, semi-public and semi-private levels within a nation state are analysed in much detail and illustrated with a huge amount of examples taken from many genres (speeches, focus-groups, interviews, media, and so forth). In addition to the critical discourse analysis of multiple genres accompanying various commemorative and celebratory events in 1995, this extended and revised edition is able to draw comparisons with similar events in 2005. The impact of socio-political changes in Austria and in the European Union is also made transparent in the attempts of constructing hegemonic national identities. Key Features: *Discourse-historical approach. *Interdisciplinarity (cultural studies, discourse analysis, history, political science). *Multi-method, multi-genre. *Qualitative case studies.