Support by warning or by action: Which is appropriate under mismatches between driver intent and traffic conditions?
Support by warning or by action: Which is appropriate under mismatches between driver intent and traffic conditions?
复制标题
DOI：
10.1093/ietfec/e90-a.11.2540
复制
发表时间：
2007-11-01
影响因子：
0.5
通讯作者：
Nagai, Yoshitomo
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Inagaki, Toshiyuki;Itoh, Makoto;Nagai, Yoshitomo
本文试图回答以下问题：当通过某种方法监测驾驶员的行为和交通环境，确定驾驶员的意图可能不适合交通状况时，应该给予汽车驾驶员什么样的支持？在一个中等保真度的移动基座驾驶模拟器上，对三种情况进行了比较：(a)警告型支持，即向驾驶员提供听觉警告以增强其对情况的识别；(b)行动型支持，即执行自主安全控制动作以避免事故发生；(c)基线条件，即不提供驾驶员支持。结果表明：(1)两种驾驶员支持方式均能有效预防交通事故。(2)驱动程序支持功能的接受程度随上下文而变化。(3)参与者接受系统发起的自动化调用，只要不可能发生自动化意外。
This paper tries to answer the following question: What type of support should be given to an automobile driver when it is determined, via some method to monitor the driver's behavior and the traffic environment, that the driver's intent may not be appropriate to a traffic condition? With a medium fidelity, moving-base driving simulator, three conditions were compared: (a) Warning type support in which an auditory warning is given to the driver to enhance his/her situation recognition, (b) action type support in which an autonomous safety control action is executed to avoid an accident, and (c) the baseline condition in which no driver support is given. Results were as follows: (1) Either type of driver support was effective in accident prevention. (2) Acceptance of driver support functions varied context dependently. (3) Participants accepted a systeminitiated automation invocation as long as no automation surprises were possible to occur.