Alcohol's role in domestic violence: a contributing cause or an excuse?
Alcohol's role in domestic violence: a contributing cause or an excuse?
复制标题
酒精在家庭暴力中的作用：是原因还是借口？
DOI：
10.1034/j.1600-0447.106.s412.3.x
复制
发表时间：
2002
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Leonard,KE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Leonard,KE
目的：本文回顾了有关酒精相关暴力的异常否认方法的证据。它的重点是酒精中毒是否被用来为家庭暴力开脱，以及这是否可以解释酒精/暴力的关联。方法：确定了源自异常否认方法的四个假设，包括（i）人们接受酒精作为暴力的原因； (ii) 人们对醉酒的攻击者的责备和惩罚比对清醒的攻击者的责备和惩罚要少； (iii) 认为酒精导致暴力或成为暴力借口的观点应与酒精相关家庭暴力的发生相关联并预测其发生； (iv) 服用安慰剂会增加攻击性行为。结果：审查表明，有些人确实接受酒精是暴力的原因，但酒精似乎并不能减轻责备，而且这种信念并不能纵向预测暴力。结论：酒精和家庭暴力的偏差否认模型的证据似乎相当薄弱。
Objective:This paper reviews evidence regarding the deviance disavowal approach to alcohol‐related violence. It focuses on whether alcohol intoxication is used to excuse domestic violence, and whether this can explain alcohol/violence association.Method:Four hypotheses derived from the deviance disavowal approach were identified, including (i) people accept alcohol as a cause of violence; (ii) people attribute less blame and punishment to intoxicated aggressors than to sober aggressors; (iii) the belief that alcohol causes or excuses violence should be associated with and predict the occurrence of alcohol‐related domestic violence; and (iv) the administration of a placebo should increase aggressive behaviour.Results:The review suggested that some people do accept alcohol as a cause of violence, but that alcohol does not appear to mitigate blame, and this belief is not longitudinally predictive of violence.Conclusion:The evidence for a deviance disavowal model of alcohol and domestic violence appears quite weak.