SUBCLASS-SPECIFIC SEQUENCE MOTIFS IDENTIFIED IN RAB GTPASES
SUBCLASS-SPECIFIC SEQUENCE MOTIFS IDENTIFIED IN RAB GTPASES
复制标题
DOI:
10.1016/s0968-0004(00)88939-2
复制
发表时间:
1995-01-01
影响因子:
13.8
通讯作者:
PALME, K
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
MOORE, I;SCHELL, J;PALME, K
We have identified sequence motifs that may be involved in determining the functional specificity of small Ras-ltke GTPases of the Rub family. Members of the Rub family are critical [or the proper movement of transport vesicles between different compartments o| eukaryotic cells l,'. The Rub family is divided into subclasses (numbered Rabl to Rub24) based on sequence similarities, in several cases these subclasses are known to reflect functional similarity or equivalence among members from different species. All members of the Rub family appear to be able to bind and hydrolyse GTP; however, members of individual subclasses appear to act specifically at one of several different steps in the endocytic and exocytic pathways. Thus, Rub GTPases have both individual and shared functions that are presumably reflected in their sequences. The most highly conserved residues of Rub GTPases are involved in nucleotide binding and hydrolysis, functions common to all Ras-like GTPases. Other regions presumably contain the information that specifies individual functions. One such region is the'effector region', which interacts with subclass-specific GTPaseactivating proteins (GAPs) 2, 3. Its sequence is highly conserved within each Rab subclass, but diverges considerably between functionally distinct subclasses 2, 3. We have now identified a second subclass-specific region in Rab GTPases.We grouped Rub sequences into subclasses on tile basis of overall similarity'and lde~ tical effector regions. We identified those residues that are hwa~ font h~ proteins of one subclass, but that are not found at the equivalent position in proteins of related subclasses. The analysis was limited to subclasses [or which members are known from distantly related taxonomic groups, as this allowed the identification of residues that are most highly conserved within the subclass. The results, plotted in Fig. la, show a peak of subclass-specific residues around the effector region as expected, but a second major peak occurs around position 100 (representing a'window'from residues 100 to 110 and corresponding to~-helix 3 and loop 7 of Ha-Ras4. S; see legend to Fig. 1). It is noteworthy that domain-swapping experiments betweeu two yeast Rub proteins showed that this region acts cooperatively with the effector region and the carboxy-terminal membrane-targeting signal to confer functional specificity to each Rub. in fact, there is notable coincidence between the Rub specificity domains thus identified and the peaks of subclass-specific residues in Fig. la, testifying to the functional significance of our analysis. Stenmark et ai.(1994) have also identified-heiix 3--loop 7 as a specificity domain in mammalian Rab5, and shown its functional importance 9.