IMPLICATIONS OF THE DOHA DECLARATION ON THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH
IMPLICATIONS OF THE DOHA DECLARATION ON THE TRIPS AGREEMENT AND PUBLIC HEALTH
复制标题
《多哈宣言》对 TRIPS 协议和公众健康的影响
DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2002
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
C. Correa
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Correa
Requests for permission to reproduce or translate WHO publications – whether for sale or for noncommercial distribution – should be addressed to Publications, at the above address (fax: +41 22 791 4806; email: permissions@who.int). The designations employed and the presentation of the material in this publication do not imply the expression of any opinion whatsoever on the part of the World Health Organization concerning the legal status of any country, territory, city or area or of its authorities, or concerning the delimitation of its frontiers or boundaries. Dotted lines on maps represent approximate border lines for which there may not yet be full agreement. The mention of specific companies or of certain manufacturers' products does not imply that they are endorsed or recommended by the World Health Organization in preference to others of a similar nature that are not mentioned. Errors and omissions excepted, the names of proprietary products are distinguished by initial capital letters. The World Health Organization does not warrant that the information contained in this publication is complete and correct and shall not be liable for any damages incurred as a result of its use. which affirms that the TRIPS Agreement should be interpreted and implemented so as to protect public health and promote access to medicines for all, marked a watershed in international trade demonstrating that a rules-based trading system should be compatible with public health interests. The Declaration enshrines the principle WHO has publicly advocated and advanced over the last four years, namely the reaffirmation of the right of WTO Members to make full use of the safeguard provisions of the TRIPS Agreement to protect public health and enhance access to medicines. Article 31 (f) of the TRIPS Agreement stipulates that a compulsory licence must be issued predominantly for the supply of the domestic market of the Member granting the licence. Consequently, many countries without a significant pharmaceutical sector have not been able to take advantage of the compulsory licensing provisions of TRIPS. Although Members may issue compulsory licences for importation, they are restricted to importing goods from countries where pharmaceuticals are not patented, or where their term of protection has expired. As the sources for generic production of newer life saving drugs will increasingly run out after 2005, resolving this problem is of extreme importance to Members' efforts to secure access to affordable medicines to address public health needs. Consequently, Paragraph 6 of the …