NATO Global Perceptions Views from the Asia-Pacific Region
NATO Global Perceptions Views from the Asia-Pacific Region
复制标题
北约全球看法 亚太地区的看法
DOI：
10.1080/14799855.2017.1361726
复制
发表时间：
2018
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
V.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Chaban;N.;Bacon;P.;Burton;J. and Vernygora;V.
在一个以全球实力转移为特征的世界中，北约的伙伴关系--在欧洲和其他地方--对该组织至关重要。然而，联盟的全球伙伴如何在合作安全、集体防御和危机管理的背景下看待北约--包括北约的目标、行动能力、职能能力和影响力--这一问题仍然是印象性的，没有得到充分解决。本文讨论了北约在亚太地区的五个全球伙伴（澳大利亚、日本、蒙古、新西兰和韩国）中的形象和看法。它将看法视为全球对北约期望背后的关键因素，并将其视为引发其伙伴对北约全球倡议的一系列反应的关键文化过滤器。本文阐述并解释了用于特刊的理论框架，Miskimmon等人。的“战略叙事”理论，并解释了每篇文章如何分别强调北约在该地区的战略叙事的形成，投影/传播和接收。贡献集中在外部的看法，图像和北约的叙述后，国际安全援助部队（ISAF）在阿富汗的使命结束，后克里米亚，并在美国大选后的背景下进行了讨论。
In a world characterized by shifts in global power, NATO’s partnerships – in Europe as well as elsewhere – are critical for the organization. Yet the question of how the Alliance’s global partners perceive NATO in the context of cooperative security, collective defence, and crisis management – including NATO’s goals, operational capacity, functional capability, and influence – remains impressionistic and under-addressed. This paper launches discussion about images and perceptions of NATO in the alliance’s five global partners in the Asia-Pacific (Australia, Japan, Mongolia, New Zealand, and the Republic of Korea). It treats perceptions as key factors behind global expectations of NATO, and as a key cultural filter triggering a range of its partners’ reactions to NATO’s global initiatives. The paper sets out and explains the theoretical framework used for the Special Issue, Miskimmon et al.’s ‘strategic narrative’ theory, and explains how each of the articles respectively emphasize the formation, projection/communication and reception of NATO’s strategic narratives in the region. Contributions focus on external perceptions, images, and narratives of NATO after the end of the International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) mission in Afghanistan, and post-Crimea, and are discussed in a post-US election context.