The Evaluation of Communicative Language Proficiency: A Critique of the ACTFL Oral Interview
The Evaluation of Communicative Language Proficiency: A Critique of the ACTFL Oral Interview
复制标题
交际语言能力的评估：对 ACTFL 口语面试的批判
DOI：
10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05294.x
复制
发表时间：
1986
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
S. Savignon
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Lyle F. Bachman;S. Savignon
以美国外语教学能力指南理事会为主要代表的“能力运动”（指引）及语文能力口试2《指引》的支持者明确而合理地声称，《指引》不仅可以为标准参照测试和提高专业水平提供依据，（Higgs，1982），而且也是外语课程设计和外语教学方法的新蓝图。当然，许多人愤世嫉俗地认为，这一努力只是近几十年来访问我们的众多潮流中的又一个。
the "Proficiency Movement," primarily represented by the American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages Proficiency Guidelines (Guidelines) and the oral interview test of language proficiency ("ACTFL Oral Interview") based on them.2 Proponents of the Guidelines have made the explicit and reasonable claim that they can provide not only a basis for criterion-referenced testing and improved professional standards (Higgs, 1982), but also a new blueprint for foreign language curriculum design and foreign language teaching methods.3 However, many in our profession expect the Guidelines to provide the solution to all classroom trials and tribulations. And, of course, many cynically view the effort as simply another of the many bandwagons to visit us in recent decades.