Role of symmetric dimethylarginine in predicting future renal impairment in liver transplant recipients.
Role of symmetric dimethylarginine in predicting future renal impairment in liver transplant recipients.
复制标题
对称二甲基精氨酸在预测肝移植受者未来肾损伤中的作用。
DOI:
10.1111/tri.13771
复制
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Watt,KymberlyD
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Izzy,Manhal;Angirekula,Mounika;Bentall,Andrew;Plevak,Matthew;Dierkhising,Ross;Lerman,LilachO;Tang,Hui;Hickson,LaTonya;Watt,KymberlyD
Dear Editors Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is common among liver transplant recipients (LTR) and is associated with worse graft and patient survival. Multiple factors are associated with development of renal dysfunction in LTRs including use of calcineurin inhibitors, diabetes mellitus (DM), and hypertension [1]. The underlying pathophysiology for the development of CKD involves changes in renal endothelium [2]. Symmetric dimethylarginine (SDMA) is believed to be related to endothelial dysfunction [3], and it is eliminated mainly by the kidney [4]. SDMA was shown to predict worsening renal function in kidney transplant recipients [5]. However, it is unknown if SDMA demonstrates the same advantage in LTR. We studied SDMA levels in the early post-transplant period relative to later decline in kidney function. The study was a pilot retrospective analysis of records of LTRs who underwent liver transplant between 2/2012 and 2/2015 at Mayo Clinic-Rochester and had stored serum specimens from prior a research study. The original cohort included patients between 18 and 70 years old who, during liver transplant evaluation, were enrolled in a prospective long-term follow-up study. The specimens had been collected 3 weeks post-transplant. Recipients of simultaneous kidney–liver transplant were excluded. The SDMA testing was performed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits provided by ALPCO â. Demographic, clinical, and biochemical data were collected. The primary endpoint was poor renal outcomes defined by decline of eGFR to< 30 ml/min per 1.73 m2. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS â version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).There were forty-nine LTRs in this study with mean age 55.4 (+ 11.8) years of whom 18 were females. Median pretransplant eGFR was 78.3 (IQR 58.5, 123.1) ml/min/1.73 m2. Median eGFR at 3 weeks post-transplant was 73.6 (IQR 60.9–91.1) ml/min/1.73 m2. 17 patients had DM. The median follow-up time of the whole cohort was 4.2 years during which twenty-five patients reached the endpoint. Median SDMA level was 1.1 (IQR 0.7, 1.6) μmol/l at 3 weeks. On univariate analysis, for every 1.0 μmol/l increase in SDMA level at 3 weeks post-transplant there was increased risk of future poor renal outcomes (HR 1.99, 95% CI 1.03–3.84, P= 0.04). Upon analyzing the cohort based on SDMA quartiles, higher quartiles associated with higher risk of poor renal outcomes (Fig. 1). After controlling for DM, on bivariate analysis, 3 weeks post-transplant SDMA showed a trend toward significance (HR 1.92, CI 95% 0.97–3.82, P= 0.06) in relation to future poor renal outcomes. Upon adjusting for baseline eGFR, neither SDMA nor baseline eGFR showed statistically significant association with eventual poor renal outcomes. This pilot study sheds light on the potential utility of SDMA in LTRs and suggests that higher levels of SDMA in the early post-transplant setting, reflective of increased endothelial dysfunction and decreased renal clearance, may relate to future poor renal outcomes. While the high rate of poor renal outcomes suggests selection bias as specimens were obtained from prior study repository, this would not affect the study concept regarding predicting renal outcomes. These preliminary observations identify a potential for future investigation of this novel biomarker to aid in early prediction of poor renal outcomes after liver transplant.