Reply to “Comment on ‘Piezoelectricity in planar boron nitride via a geometric phase' ”

Reply to “Comment on ‘Piezoelectricity in planar boron nitride via a geometric phase' ”
复制标题

DOI:
10.1103/physrevb.98.167404
复制
发表时间:
2018-10
期刊:
影响因子:
3.7
通讯作者:
Matthias Droth;G. Burkard;V. M. Pereira
Matthias Droth;G. Burkard;V. M. Pereira
中科院分区:
物理与天体物理2区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Matthias Droth;G. Burkard;V. M. Pereira

文献摘要

相似文献

关于我们的原始文件[M。Droth等人,Phys. Rev. B 94,075404(2016)],Li等人的评论[Phys. Rev. B 98,167403(2018)]声称已经确定了“构建压电绝热过程的错误”。更具体地说,他们写道,在我们的原始工作中,“方程中极化差公式的错误使用。(4)导致方程中压电常数的解析表达式无效。(12)参考1”。我们将在下面解释为什么评论中的这些和其他次要声明是没有根据的,以及为什么我们坚持认为我们的结果是正确的和物理上合理的。
In relation to our original paper [M. Droth et al., Phys. Rev. B 94, 075404 (2016)], the Comment by Li et al. [Phys. Rev. B 98, 167403 (2018)] claims to have identified a "mistake in constructing the adiabatic process of the piezoelectricity". More specifically, they write that in our original work "the erroneous usage of the polarization difference formula in Eq. (4) leads to an invalid analytical expression of piezoelectric constant in Eq. (12) of Reference 1". We explain below why these and other minor claims in the Comment are unwarranted, and why we maintain that our result is correct and physically sound.