Carboplatin response in preclinical models for ovarian cancer: comparison of 2D monolayers, spheroids, ex vivo tumors and in vivo models.
Carboplatin response in preclinical models for ovarian cancer: comparison of 2D monolayers, spheroids, ex vivo tumors and in vivo models.
复制标题
DOI:
10.1038/s41598-021-97434-w
复制
发表时间:
2021-09-14
影响因子:
4.6
通讯作者:
Mes-Masson AM
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Brodeur MN;Simeone K;Leclerc-Deslauniers K;Fleury H;Carmona E;Provencher DM;Mes-Masson AM
Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the most lethal gynecological cancer. Among the key challenges in developing effective therapeutics is the poor translation of preclinical models used in the drug discovery pipeline. This leaves drug attrition rates and costs at an unacceptably high level. Previous work has highlighted the discrepancies in therapeutic response between current in vitro and in vivo models. To address this, we conducted a comparison study to differentiate the carboplatin chemotherapy response across four different model systems including 2D monolayers, 3D spheroids, 3D ex vivo tumors and mouse xenograft models. We used six previously characterized EOC cell lines of varying chemosensitivity and performed viability assays for each model. In vivo results from the mouse model correlated with 2D response in 3/6 cell lines while they correlated with 3D spheroids and the ex vivo model in 4/6 and 5/5 cell lines, respectively. Our results emphasize the variability in therapeutic response across models and demonstrate that the carboplatin response in EOC cell lines cultured in a 3D ex vivo model correlates best with the in vivo response. These results highlight a more feasible, reliable, and cost-effective preclinical model with the highest translational potential for drug screening and prediction studies in EOC.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
4.6
作者:
Davies EJ;Dong M;Gutekunst M;Närhi K;van Zoggel HJ;Blom S;Nagaraj A;Metsalu T;Oswald E;Erkens-Schulze S;Delgado San Martin JA;Turkki R;Wedge SR;af Hällström TM;Schueler J;van Weerden WM;Verschuren EW;Barry ST;van der Kuip H;Hickman JA
通讯作者:
Hickman JA
影响因子:
3.2
作者:
Das, Tamal;Meunier, Liliane;Mes-Masson, Anne-Marie
通讯作者:
Mes-Masson, Anne-Marie
影响因子:
5.7
作者:
Aihara A;Abe N;Saruhashi K;Kanaki T;Nishino T
通讯作者:
Nishino T
影响因子:
16.6
作者:
Majumder, Biswanath;Baraneedharan, Ulaganathan;Thiyagarajan, Saravanan;Radhakrishnan, Padhma;Narasimhan, Harikrishna;Dhandapani, Muthu;Brijwani, Nilesh;Pinto, Dency D.;Prasath, Arun;Shanthappa, Basavaraja U.;Thayakumar, Allen;Surendran, Rajagopalan;Babu, Govind K.;Shenoy, Ashok M.;Kuriakose, Moni A.;Bergthold, Guillaume;Horowitz, Peleg;Loda, Massimo;Beroukhim, Rameen;Agarwal, Shivani;Sengupta, Shiladitya;Sundaram, Mallikarjun;Majumder, Pradip K.
通讯作者:
Majumder, Pradip K.
影响因子:
11.2
作者:
Hirst J;Pathak HB;Hyter S;Pessetto ZY;Ly T;Graw S;Koestler DC;Krieg AJ;Roby KF;Godwin AK
通讯作者:
Godwin AK