Effects of Sit-up Training versus Core Stabilization Exercises on Sit-up Performance
Effects of Sit-up Training versus Core Stabilization Exercises on Sit-up Performance
复制标题
DOI：
10.1249/mss.0b013e3181a84db2
复制
发表时间：
2009-11-01
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
George, Steven Z.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Childs, John D.;Teyhen, Deydre S.;George, Steven Z.
孩子的。J. D， D. S . TEYHEN, T . M . BENEDICT， J. B. MORRIS, A . D. FORTENBERRY, R . M . MCQUEEN， J. B. PRESTON, A . C . WRIGHT， J. I. DUGAN, S . Z. GEORGE。医学科学运动练习。，第41卷。11。pp 2072-2083, 2009核心稳定运动的目标是腹部和躯干肌肉，而不需要仰卧起坐时的过度负荷。然而，核心稳定运动项目（CSEP）并没有在美国陆军中广泛采用，部分原因是人们认为它们会对陆军体能测试中的表现产生有害影响。目的是确定在单位体能训练中使用CSEP代替仰卧起坐是否会对仰卧起坐的表现和体能测试的通过率产生不利影响。方法将年龄在18至35岁之间的士兵（N = 2616）随机分为传统锻炼计划（TEP）和仰卧起坐或CSEP。先前有腰痛或其他损伤史的受试者被排除在外，不能参加训练。训练计划每周完成四次，持续12周，在基线和12周后评估表现。随着时间的推移，两组的仰卧起坐表现和整体健康得分都有显著改善（P < 0.001）。整体体能得分（P = 0.142）和仰卧起坐成绩（P = 0.543）在组间无显著差异。然而，CSEP导致仰卧起坐通过率显著提高5.6%，而TEP组为3.9% （P = 0.004）。结论。CSEP对仰卧起坐表现、整体健康得分或通过率没有不利影响。CSEP组的仰卧起坐通过率（5.6%）比TEP组（3.9%）有小幅但显著的提高。将CSEP纳入陆军体能训练不会增加在陆军体能测试中表现不佳的风险，并且可能对提高仰卧起坐的表现有一点好处
CHILDS. J. D., D S TEYHEN, T M BENEDICT, J B MORRIS, A D FORTENBERRY, R M MCQUEEN, J B. PRESTON, A C WRIGHT, J I. DUGAN, and S Z. GEORGE Effects of Sit-up Training versus Core Stabilization Exercises on Sit-up Performance. Med Sci Sports Exerc., Vol 41. No. 11. pp 2072-2083, 2009 Purpose. Core stabilization exercises target abdominal and trunk muscles without the excessive loading that occurs during sit-ups However, core stabilization exercise programs (CSEP) have not been widely adopted in the US Army partially because of the perceived deleterious impact they would have on performance during the Army Physical Fitness Test. The purpose was to determine whether performing CSEP in lieu of sit-ups during unit physical training would have detrimental effects on sit-up performance and passing rates on the fitness test Methods Soldiers (N = 2616) between 18 and 35 yr of age were randomized to receive a traditional exercise program (TEP) with sit-ups or CSEP. Subjects with a previous history of low back pain or other injury precluding participation in training were excluded The training programs were completed four times per week for 12 wk Performance was assessed at baseline and after 12 wk Results. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in sit-up performance and overall fitness scores over time (P < 0.001). There were no significant between-group differences in overall Fitness scores (P = 0.142) or sit-up performance (P = 0.543). However, CSEP resulted in a Significant improvement in sit-up passing rates by 5.6% compared with 3.9% for the TEP group (P = 0 004). Conclusions. CSEP did not have a detrimental impact on sit-up performance or overall fitness scores or pass rates. There was a small but significantly greater increase in sit-up pass rate in the CSEP (5.6%) versus the TEP group (3.9%). Incorporating CSEP into Army physical training does not increase the risk of suboptimal performance on the Army's fitness test and may offer a small benefit for improving sit-up performance