Testing Assessments of Integrated Experiential Learning

Testing Assessments of Integrated Experiential Learning
复制标题

DOI:
10.4018/978-1-7998-7768-4.ch018
复制
发表时间:
2021-01-01
期刊:
APPLYING DESIGN THINKING TO THE MEASUREMENT OF EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Louson, Eleanor
Louson, Eleanor
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
Heinrich, William F.;Ludwig, Patrice M.;Louson, Eleanor

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

设计思维是一个强大的平台,提供了衡量综合体验式学习(IEL)的结构和流程。 IEL 将体验式学习活动置于跨学科环境中,通过反思经验来促进学习,这些经验将深入的知识广泛应用并跨越课外和课程环境。作者以两个机构开发的课程作为案例研究,描述了教学法、教学和评估方法,并重点介绍了数据类型、收集、分析和三种评估方法(反思、网络和可交付成果)的影响。他们展示了设计思维对于课程和机构利益相关者(包括学生和学术事务、校友关系、雇主和当地企业,以及那些专注于改进设计的数据的机构(例如机构研究和立法者))的 IEL 评估至关重要。此外,他们还表明,设计思维的评估阶段对于设计思维 IEL 项目的可持续性、可扩展性和严谨性至关重要。
Design thinking is a powerful platform that provides the structure and process to measure integrated experiential learning (IEL). IEL situates the activities of experiential learning in an interdisciplinary setting that facilitates learning through reflection on experiences that engage deep knowledge in broad applications and span co-curricular and curricular environments. Using courses developed at two institutions as case studies, the authors describe pedagogy, instruction, and assessment methods, and focus the data types, collection, analysis, and implications of three assessment approaches (reflections, networks, and deliverables). They show how design thinking is essential to the assessment of IEL in courses and across institutional stakeholders, including student and academic affairs, alumni relations, employers and local businesses, and those focused on data for improvement in design (e.g., institutional research and legislators). Moreover, they show that the assessment phase of design thinking is essential to sustainability, scalability, and rigor of design thinking IEL projects.