Command, control and contestation: negotiating security at the L ondon 2012 O lympics
Command, control and contestation: negotiating security at the L ondon 2012 O lympics
复制标题
命令、控制和对抗：2012 年伦敦奥运会的安全谈判
DOI：
10.1111/geoj.12058
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Fussey P
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Fussey P
大型活动安全通常被描述为在规模，范围和形式方面的特殊实践，并通过宏观理论的视角进行了各种考虑，引用了总体学科，新自由主义，殖民社团主义和其他基于利益的愿望的主张。基于实证分析的伦敦2012年奥运会的安全操作和那些谁抵制它（包括数据来自访谈和参与者的观察与关键的安全机构和活动家），本文询问复杂的，多样的，往往是支离破碎的空间在整个奥运会附近的监控站。尽管奥运会规划者声称目标一致（例如保护赞助商进入市场），但更详细的分析表明，排序过程的应用和目的是有争议的，有时是相互矛盾的。在这方面，长期以来人们认识到，空间可以同时以多种方式加以利用，这反映在对空间的控制上。根据福柯的安全概念，不同的秩序强加-管制的、排斥的、纪律的、暗示的和缓和的-被认为同时存在于同一个广泛定义的领域。
Mega‐event security is often characterised as an exceptional exercise in terms of scale, scope and form, and considered variously through macro‐theoretical lenses citing the assertion of overarching disciplinary, neoliberal, colonial corporatist and other interest‐based aspirations. Based on empirical analysis of the London 2012 Olympic security operation and of those who resisted it (including data drawn from interviews and participant observations with key security agencies and activists), this paper interrogates the complex, diverse and often fragmented contestations over space across the Olympic neighbourhood. Despite the professed unity of purpose among Olympic planners (such as the protection of sponsors' access to the marketplace), more detailed analysis reveals both the application and purpose of ordering processes as contested and sometimes contradictory realms. Here, the longstanding recognition that space is used in simultaneously diverse ways is reflected in its control. Drawing on Foucauldian notions of security different impositions of order – regulatory, exclusionary, disciplinary, suggestive and assuasive – are argued to exist simultaneously in the same broadly defined area.