Temporal analog of the minimally distinct border

Temporal analog of the minimally distinct border
复制标题

最小明显边界的时间模拟

DOI:
10.1016/0042-6989(78)90085-8
复制
发表时间:
1978
期刊:
影响因子:
1.8
通讯作者:
P. Kaiser
P. Kaiser
中科院分区:
心理学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. M. Boynton;P. Kaiser

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在本说明中,我们提出了旧的数据,现在看到一个新的光。十年前进行的实验工作(Boynton,Kaiser和Shlaer,1967)现在可以被看作是我们后来发展的最小不同边界(MDB)方法的时间模拟(Boynton和Kaiser,1968; Kaiser,Boynton和Herzberg,1971)。最近对MDB的实验表明,短波长敏感(S)视锥细胞对这种边界的形成没有贡献(坦斯利和Boynton,1976;坦斯利,1976)。对于我们的闪烁实验的某些条件,现在可以解释为S视锥细胞也不有助于闪烁的感知。该方法的原理如图1所示,在标题中给出了完整的解释。而同色闪烁曲线必须达到零时,两个组成部分的领域是相同的亮度,异色曲线不。相反,该曲线的最小值定义了相等亮度的条件。在该最小值处的纵坐标值对应于临界闪烁频率(cfl),其可在单色情况下针对亮度的某个特定失配r获得。以这种方式确定的r值用于定义图3所示的等效消色差对比度值。
In this note, we present old data that are now seen in a new light. The experimental work, carried out a decade ago (Boynton, Kaiser and Shlaer, 1967), can now be viewed as a temporal analog of the method of minimally distinct border (MDB) which we developed somewhat later (Boynton and Kaiser, 1968; Kaiser, Boynton and Herzberg, 1971). More recent experiments with the MDB have shown that short wavelength sensitive (S) cones do not contribute to the formation of such borders (Tansley and Boynton, 1976; Tansley, 1976). For some conditions of our flicker experiment it can now be interpreted that the S cones do not contribute to the perception of flicker either.The principles of the method are illustrated in Fig. 1, where a full explanation is given in the caption. Whereas the homochromatic flicker curve must reach zero when the two components of the field are of equal luminance, the heterochromatic curve does not. Instead, the minimum of that curve defines a condition of equal luminance. The ordinate value at this minimum corresponds to a critical flicker frequency (cflJ that is obtainable for some specific mismatch r of luminances in the homochromatic case. Values of r determined in this way were used to define the equivalent achromatic contrast values shown in Fig. 3.