MOTIVES AND VALUES TO ACHIEVE - DIFFERENT CONSTRUCTS WITH DIFFERENT EFFECTS
MOTIVES AND VALUES TO ACHIEVE - DIFFERENT CONSTRUCTS WITH DIFFERENT EFFECTS
复制标题
DOI：
10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00761.x
复制
发表时间：
1989-03-01
影响因子：
5
通讯作者：
BIERNAT, M
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
BIERNAT, M
成就动机和与成就相关的价值观被概念化为不同的独立人格结构，一个是无意识的，另一个是有意识的，每一个都预测不同类型的成就相关行为。假设（a）动机和价值测量是不相关的，（B）动机将预测“操作性”或自发行为，而价值观将预测“反应性”或刺激驱动的行为，以及（c）动机和价值观将相互作用，使得具有与成就相关的高价值观的受试者将比具有低价值观的受试者表现得更好，但仅当他们的动机也很高时。假设（a）和（B）在两项研究中得到强烈支持，假设（c）在研究2中得到支持在该研究中，在那些重视成就而不是归属感的受试者中，成就动机是操作数学表现的一个特别强的预测因素。研究结果表明，无意识（动机）和有意识（价值）测量在不同的情况下都是有用的，前者用于预测“真实的”（做）活动，后者用于预测自我报告（思考）反应关于动机和价值观如何结合联合收割机来预测不同类型的行为的问题得到解决
Motives to achieve and values associated with achievement were conceptualized as distinct and independent personality constructs, one nonconscious, the other conscious, each predictive of a different type of achievement‐related behavior It was hypothesized that (a) motive and value measures would be uncorrelated, (b) motives would predict “operant” or spontaneous behaviors while values would predict “respondent” or stimulus‐driven behaviors, and (c) motives and values would interact such that subjects with high values relating to achievement would perform better than those with low values, but only when their motives were also high Hypotheses (a) and (b) were strongly supported m two studies, and Hypothesis (c) was supported in Study 2 In that study, the motive for achievement was a particularly strong predictor of operant math performance among those subjects who valued achievement as opposed to affiliation The findings suggest that nonconscious (motive) and conscious (value) measures are both useful in different cases–the former for predicting “real” (doing) activity, the latter for predicting self‐report (thinking) responses Questions concerning how motives and values might combine to predict different kinds of behavior are addressed