Mood management across affective states: the hedonic contingency hypothesis.
Mood management across affective states: the hedonic contingency hypothesis.
复制标题
跨情感状态的情绪管理：享乐权变假说。
DOI：
10.1037//0022-3514.66.6.1034
复制
发表时间：
1994
影响因子：
7.6
通讯作者：
Petty,RE
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Wegener,DT;Petty,RE
积极和消极情绪的情绪管理与各种社会现象有关，在文献中尤为重要。理论家预测，悲伤的人比快乐的人更有策略地参与情绪管理活动。然而，在情感状态下学习原则的应用使作者假设，快乐奖励更多地取决于对快乐状态下的快乐结果的审查，而不是悲伤状态。因此，快乐的人应该比悲伤的人更仔细地审视潜在行为的享乐后果。选择暴露范式被用来检验这种享乐偶然性假说。被诱导处于快乐、悲伤或中立状态的人被要求选择参与的活动。在三个实验中，快乐的人比悲伤或中立的人更多地基于这些活动的情感后果做出选择。（PsycINFO数据库记录(c) 2016 APA，版权所有）
Mood management in positive and negative moods is relevant to a variety of social phenomena and has been especially important in the helping literature. Theorists have predicted that sad people strategically engage in mood management activities more than happy people. However, application of learning principles across affective states led the authors to hypothesize that hedonic rewards are more contingent on scrutiny of hedonic consequences in happy than sad states. Thus, happy people should scrutinize the hedonic consequences of potential behaviors more than sad people. A selective exposure paradigm was used to test this hedonic contingency hypothesis. People in whom happy, sad, or neutral states were induced were asked to choose activities in which to engage. In 3 experiments, happy people based their choices on the affective consequences of those activities more than sad or neutral individuals.(PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2016 APA, all rights reserved)