Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: a case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador

Fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance: a case study of river catchment management in Southern Ecuador
复制标题

协作水治理框架的碎片化和连接:厄瓜多尔南部河流流域管理的案例研究

DOI:
10.1177/0020852310390108
复制
发表时间:
2011
影响因子:
2.3
通讯作者:
Dolores Sucozhañay
Dolores Sucozhañay
中科院分区:
管理学4区
文献类型:
--
作者:
A. Dewulf;M. Mancero;German Cárdenas;Dolores Sucozhañay

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

在协作水治理中,行为者给讨论带来的各种框架构成了一个重要的挑战。在这项研究中,我们分析了厄瓜多尔南部安第斯山脉Paute流域及其子流域Tabacay合作水治理项目中框架的碎片化和联系。我们依靠对项目文件、访谈和会议录音的框架分析来分析这些项目的初始阶段。我们讨论了(1)问题域框架和问题框架在框架碎片化中的不同作用;(2)量表框架对问题域和问题框架的意义;(3)将专家框架与其他参与者的框架连接起来的挑战;(4)面对面对话对连接框架的重要性。从业人员的要点世界各地的公共管理和行政专业人员越来越多地参与治理进程,他们必须与众多行为者和观点打交道。如果他们的任务涉及与其他政府机构、民间社会组织和/或商业行为者建立合作项目,那么密切关注他们自己和其他行为者是如何确定问题领域和所涉问题的,就会有很大的好处。在协作水治理过程中,需要特别注意如何根据水系统规模和行政规模制定项目框架,以及如何将问题的技术框架与其他行为者的框架和经验联系起来。
In collaborative water governance, the variety of frames that actors bring to the discussion constitutes an important challenge. In this study, we analyse the fragmentation and connection of frames in collaborative water governance projects in the Paute catchment and its sub-catchment Tabacay in the Southern Andes of Ecuador. We rely on frame analysis of project documents, interviews and meeting recordings to analyse the initial stages of these projects. We discuss (1) the different roles of problem domain framing and issue framing in frame fragmentation; (2) the significance of scale framing to problem domain and issue framing; (3) the challenge of connecting expert frames with frames of other actors; and (4) the importance of face-to-face dialogue for connecting frames. Points for practitioners Professionals in public management and administration all over the world are increasingly involved in governance processes where they have to deal with a multitude of actors and perspectives. If their task involves setting up collaborative projects with other governmental agencies, civil society organizations and/or business actors, there is much to gain by paying close attention to how they themselves and other actors are framing both the problem domain and the issues involved. In processes of collaborative water governance, additional attention is required for how projects are framed with respect to water system scales and administrative scales, and for how technical framing of the issues connects to the frames and experiences of other actors.