CULTURAL STUDIES IN THE ARCHIVE The Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies
CULTURAL STUDIES IN THE ARCHIVE The Birmingham Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies
复制标题
档案中的文化研究 伯明翰当代文化研究中心
DOI:
10.1080/09502386.2013.773655
复制
发表时间:
2013
期刊:
影响因子:
1.5
通讯作者:
Hilton M
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Hilton M
An archive of the Centre for Contemporary Cultural Studies (CCCS) is currently being established at the Cadbury Research Library, University of Birmingham. Several depositions have already been made by former staff and students. Although the collective coverage of the papers is still patchy, there is enough already in the archive to begin to trace the life of the Centre from its inception in 1964 through to its eventual closure as the then Department of Cultural Studies and Sociology in 2002. There has long been an interest from various members of CCCS to ensure that the pioneering role of the Centre is properly recognized and preserved for future generations. Several discussions and initiatives have been instigated over the last few years, though the real impetus developed once Michael Green and Stuart Hall agreed that, notwithstanding a troubled past, the University of Birmingham represented the most natural home for such an archive. Before his untimely death in late 2010, Michael had put everything in place for former members to be contacted. Stuart wished for the project to continue and has helped to cajole friends and colleagues to enter their cellars and attics to retrieve precious CCCS documents.Around a dozen former members of the Centre have so far deposited their materials, adding to the Centre’s own paper trail left at the university. In addition to creating what is looking likely to be a full set of working papers and annual reports, the archive also contains press cuttings going back all the way to 1964. Particularly useful for future researchers will be the papers of the Centre’s meetings, especially those of the sub-groups and those who developed the MA in Cultural Studies. Already, if a researcher wanted to create a sense of the working life of the Centre, especially from the early 1970s through to the mid-1980s, the papers in the archive would make this possible. With further depositions, the full history of the Centre should be properly documented. Few of the depositions will match the meticulous organization of former director Richard Johnson, whose 16 boxes contain materials covering the period from 1966 to 1993. But what are needed are the partial collections of any number of individuals associated with the Centre. On their own, they may