Engaging Multidisciplinary Clinical Users in the Design of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Graphical User Interface for Intensive Care Unit Instability Decision Support.
Engaging Multidisciplinary Clinical Users in the Design of an Artificial Intelligence-Powered Graphical User Interface for Intensive Care Unit Instability Decision Support.
复制标题
让多学科临床用户参与设计人工智能驱动的图形用户界面,以支持重症监护病房不稳定决策。
DOI:
10.1055/s-0043-1775565
复制
发表时间:
2023
影响因子:
2.9
通讯作者:
Clermont,Gilles
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Helman,Stephanie;Terry,MarthaAnn;Pellathy,Tiffany;Hravnak,Marilyn;George,Elisabeth;Al-Zaiti,Salah;Clermont,Gilles
BackgroundCritical instability forecast and treatment can be optimized by artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled clinical decision support. It is important that the user-facing display of AI output facilitates clinical thinking and workflow for all disciplines involved in bedside care.ObjectivesOur objective is to engage multidisciplinary users (physicians, nurse practitioners, physician assistants) in the development of a graphical user interface (GUI) to present an AI-derived risk score.MethodsIntensive care unit (ICU) clinicians participated in focus groups seeking input on instability risk forecast presented in a prototype GUI. Two stratified rounds (three focus groups [only nurses, only providers, then combined]) were moderated by a focus group methodologist. After round 1, GUI design changes were made and presented in round 2. Focus groups were recorded, transcribed, and deidentified transcripts independently coded by three researchers. Codes were coalesced into emerging themes.ResultsTwenty-three ICU clinicians participated (11 nurses, 12 medical providers [3 mid-level and 9 physicians]). Six themes emerged: (1) analytics transparency, (2) graphical interpretability, (3) impact on practice, (4) value of trend synthesis of dynamic patient data, (5) decisional weight (weighing AI output during decision-making), and (6) display location (usability, concerns for patient/family GUI view). Nurses emphasized having GUI objective information to support communication and optimal GUI location. While providers emphasized need for recommendation interpretability and concern for impairing trainee critical thinking. All disciplines valued synthesized views of vital signs, interventions, and risk trends but were skeptical of placing decisional weight on AI output until proven trustworthy.ConclusionGaining input from all clinical users is important to consider when designing AI-derived GUIs. Results highlight that health care intelligent decisional support systems technologies need to be transparent on how they work, easy to read and interpret, cause little disruption to current workflow, as well as decisional support components need to be used as an adjunct to human decision-making.
登录
查看更多内容
影响因子:
5.8
作者:
N. Worrell;A. Cumber;G. Parnell;W. Ross;J. Forrester
通讯作者:
J. Forrester
影响因子:
11.2
作者:
Weil-Hillman,G;Runge,W;Jansen,FK;Vallera,DA
通讯作者:
Vallera,DA
DOI:
--
发表时间:
1986
期刊:
Journal of immunology (Baltimore, Md. : 1950)
影响因子:
--
作者:
Youle,RJ;Uckun,FM;Vallera,DA;Colombatti,M
通讯作者:
Colombatti,M
影响因子:
8.7
作者:
Franz K. Jansen;H. Blythman;D. Carrière;Pierre Casellas;Olivier Gros;P. Gros;Jean Claude Laurent;Francis Paolucci;Bernard Pau;P. Poncelet;Gilbert Richer;H. Vidal;Guy Andrá Voisin
通讯作者:
Guy Andrá Voisin
影响因子:
64.8
作者:
F. W. Brambell;W. A. Hemmings;I. Morris
通讯作者:
I. Morris