'A starting point for your journey, not a map': Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis
'A starting point for your journey, not a map': Nikki Hayfield in conversation with Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke about thematic analysis
复制标题
DOI：
10.1080/14780887.2019.1670765
复制
发表时间：
2019-09-30
影响因子：
19
通讯作者：
Hayfield, Nikki
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Braun, Virginia;Clarke, Victoria;Hayfield, Nikki
心理学本文试图提供指导，心理学的同事和学生，对主题分析（TA）的概念化，考虑和实践。他们的论文出乎意料地广受欢迎，无论是在他们的学科内还是学科外。在随后的几年里，他们写了一本获奖和畅销的定性研究教科书《成功的定性研究》。（Braun和Clarke，2013），许多章节（例如，Braun和Clarke 2012; Braun，Clarke和Rance，2014; Braun，Clarke和Terry 2014; Braun，Clarke和Weate，2016; Clarke and Braun 2016），百科全书条目（Clarke and Braun，2014 a，2014 b），评论（Braun和Clarke 2016，2019; Clarke和Braun 2018）和社论（Braun和Clarke 2014; Clarke和Braun 2017），并创建了一个网站（https：//www.心理学。AC. zh/about/our-research/research-groups/thematic-analysis. html），关于TA，以及书面章节和论文（例如Braun，Clarke和Gray 2017 b; Clarke和Braun 2019），并共同编辑了一本书和一个与定性研究其他方面相关的特刊（Braun et al. 2019 a; Braun，Clarke和Gray 2017 a）。在这段时间里，他们对TA的思考已经发生了变化，他们遇到了许多对他们原始论文的误用和歪曲，并对此感到沮丧。早在2019年，Nikki Hayfield-他也围绕TA写作和教学，并与他们共同撰写了几个章节（Braun et al. 2019 b; Clarke，Braun，and Hayfield 2015; Terry et al. 2017）-采访了Ginny和维多利亚，要求他们反思这些主题，以及他们作为TA支持者的过程，实践和思考。以下经过编辑的对话记录强调了他们2006年论文的写作背景，他们在撰写论文时对定性研究的一些假设，他们对错误陈述的回应，
Psychology. The paper sought to provide guidance, for psychology colleagues and students, on the conceptualisation, considerations and practice of thematic analysis (TA). Their paper proved unexpectedly popular, both within their discipline, and beyond. In the subsequent years they have written an award winning and best-selling qualitative research textbook Successful Qualitative Research (Braun and Clarke 2013), numerous chapters (eg Braun and Clarke 2012; Braun, Clarke, and Rance, 2014; Braun, Clarke, and Terry 2014; Braun, Clarke, and Weate, 2016; Clarke and Braun 2016), encyclopaedia entries (Clarke and Braun 2014a, 2014b), commentaries (Braun and Clarke 2016, 2019; Clarke and Braun 2018) and editorials (Braun and Clarke 2014; Clarke and Braun 2017), and created a website (https://www. psych. auck land. ac. nz/en/about/our-research/research-groups/thematic-analysis. html), about TA, as well as written chapters and papers (eg Braun, Clarke, and Gray 2017b; Clarke and Braun 2019), and co-edited a book and a special issue related to other aspects of qualitative research (Braun et al. 2019a; Braun, Clarke, and Gray 2017a). Over this time, their thinking around TA has evolved and they have encountered, and been frustrated by, many misuses and misrepresentations of their original paper. Early in 2019, Nikki Hayfield–who also writes and teaches around TA and has co-authored several chapters with them (Braun et al. 2019b; Clarke, Braun, and Hayfield 2015; Terry et al. 2017)–interviewed Ginny and Victoria, asking them to reflect on these topics, and on their process, practice and thinking as TA proponents. The following edited transcript of their conversation highlights the context for writing their 2006 paper, some of the assumptions about qualitative research they made in writing that paper, their responses to misrepresentations and