The effect of joint interviewing on the performance of gender
The effect of joint interviewing on the performance of gender
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/1525822x07313837
复制
发表时间：
2008-05-01
期刊：
影响因子：
1.7
通讯作者：
Ziebland, Sue
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Seale, Clive;Charteris-Black, Jonathan;Ziebland, Sue
作者报告了对58个一对一的定性访谈和37个性别混合的联合访谈的一系列对照比较，这些访谈涉及相同的健康相关主题。他们的分析确定了相对的关键词频率，并利用现有关于语言选择中常见性别差异的相关知识，对上下文中的关键词进行了定性调查。在联合采访中，性别差异缩小，女性视角更加突出，所以研究人员想要了解男性在健康相关话题上的经历，比如那些与父亲相关的话题，可能会在与男性的一对一采访中找到更多。男性更愿意在单独的面试中从事性别陈规定型的行为，其中大多数涉及女性面试官，这表明，与联合受访者的性别相当突出相比，面试官的性别认同被认为是多少中立的。这一发现潜在地有助于了解定性面试作为一种特殊形式的机构谈话。
The authors report a series of controlled comparisons of fifty-eight one-to-one qualitative interviews and thirty-seven mixed-sex joint interviews on the same health-related topics. Their analysis identifies comparative keyword frequencies and is supported by qualitative investigations of keywords in context, drawing on existing relevant knowledge of common gender differences in language choice. Gender differences are reduced and women's perspectives are more prominent in joint interviews, so researchers wanting to find out about men's experiences concerning health-related topics such as those associated with fatherhood may find out more in one-to-one interviews with men. The greater readiness of men to engage in gender-stereotyped behavior in sole interviews, most of which involved a female interviewer, suggests that an interviewer's gender identity is perceived as somewhat neutral by comparison with the considerable salience of the gender of a joint respondent. This finding potentially contributes to knowledge of the qualitative interview as a special form of institutional talk.