Legibility and the Legacy of Racialized Dispossession in Digital Agriculture
Legibility and the Legacy of Racialized Dispossession in Digital Agriculture
复制标题
数字农业中种族化剥夺的易读性和遗产
DOI:
10.1145/3479867
复制
发表时间:
2021
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Sengers, Phoebe
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
Liu, Jen;Sengers, Phoebe
This paper examines the causes and consequences of legibility as an organizing principle in the design of digital agriculture (DA) systems in the United States. Legibility refers to systems of governance that use simplified understandings of a situation to control and direct action upon it. Legibility in digital agriculture systems occurs at the confluence of two traditions of legibility: the data-driven model common in the design of digital systems, and tactics for the control of nature and labor that have developed in the United States since the foundation of the colonies. Our argument draws from (1) a historical analysis of broader patterns of agricultural technology and racialized land dispossession in what is now the United States and (2) empirical fieldwork that examines the adoption and maintenance of digital agriculture systems in rural New York State. We describe the role that legibility historically has played in the development of agricultural systems in the US, and their consequences for who is able to farm and how. This history raises the questions: What is made legible to whom? In that process, what becomes illegible? While legibility promises transparent and environmentally beneficial control, in our fieldwork we find that the demands of legibility are also restructuring the physical landscape, creating additional invisible labor, producing systems that are brittle to real-world conditions on farms, and creating opaque systems that block people from adapting to their circumstances. In reading our fieldwork together with the historical case, we demonstrate the pressures that are shaping the stakes, subject, and objects of legibility in agricultural technology. As more data-driven systems are used for environmental contexts, the CSCW community needs to extend its ways to understand how data-driven systems impact land, labor, and resources.
登录
查看更多内容
DOI:
10.1177/0263775820922233
发表时间:
2020
期刊:
Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
影响因子:
--
作者:
M. A. Palmer
通讯作者:
M. A. Palmer
影响因子:
--
作者:
J. Burrell
通讯作者:
J. Burrell
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2006
期刊:
影响因子:
--
作者:
関口 彰、井上 勝雄;他2名;井上勝雄;広川美津雄;広川美津雄;井上勝雄;井上勝雄;井上勝雄;井上 勝雄;Katuo Inoue;井上 勝雄;Katuo Inoue;井上 勝雄;Katuo Inoue;井上 勝雄;関口 彰;Katsuo Inoue;Akira Sekiguchi;井上 勝雄;Katuo inoue;井上 勝雄;井上 勝雄;Katsuo Inoue;Mitsuo Horokawa;井上 勝雄;Katsuo Inoue;井上 勝雄;関口 彰;Katuo Inoue;Akira Sekiguchi;関口 彰;井上 勝雄;Katsuo Inoue;井上 勝雄;Katsuo Inoue;井上 勝雄;Katsuo Inoue
通讯作者:
Katsuo Inoue
DOI:
--
发表时间:
2019
期刊:
Civil War Book Review
影响因子:
--
作者:
Tom Barber
通讯作者:
Tom Barber
影响因子:
3.6
作者:
Carbonell, Isabelle M.
通讯作者:
Carbonell, Isabelle M.