Resilient and stress-affected adolescents in an urban setting

Resilient and stress-affected adolescents in an urban setting
复制标题

DOI:
10.1207/s15374424jccp2901_13
复制
发表时间:
2000-03-01
期刊:
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL CHILD PSYCHOLOGY
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Ippolito, MF
Ippolito, MF
中科院分区:
其他
文献类型:
--
作者:
D'Imperio, RL;Dubow, EF;Ippolito, MF

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

研究了185名七年级和八年级的市中心青少年。参与者被归类为低和高暴露于压力源(压力事件或邻里劣势)和外部表现出的能力(自我,教师和学校报告)。我们预测,弹性(高压力/高能力)和压力影响(高压力/低能力)的青年将在假设的保护资源的三个领域有所不同:地狱资源(即,应对技能,感知能力),家庭支持和家庭外支持。我们还预测,在经历内化问题(抑郁,焦虑)方面,有弹性的年轻人会付出情感代价。压力源水平对几种保护性资源有直接影响;然而,假设的保护性资源并不能区分弹性和压力影响的青年。弹性和压力影响的青年经历了相同水平的内化症状,这些群体的得分高于低压力参与者。这些结果可能反映了慢性压力源的影响。
Studied 185 seventh- and eighth-grade inner-city adolescents. Participants were categorized as low and high in exposure to stressors (stressful events or neighborhood disadvantage) and externally exhibited competence (self-, teacher, and school reports). We predicted that resilient (high-stress/high-competence) and stress-affected (high-stress/low-competence) youth would differ across three domains of hypothesized protective resources: infernal resources (i.e., coping skills, perceived competence), familial support, and extrafamilial support. We also predicted that there would be an emotional cost to resilient youth in terms of experiencing internalizing problems (depression, anxiety). There were direct effects for stressor level on several protective resources; however, the hypothesized protective resources did not discriminate resilient from stress-affected youth. Both Resilient and stress-affected youth experienced equivalent levels of internalizing symptoms, and these groups' scores were higher than those of low-stress participants. These results are possibly reflective of the effects of chronic stressors.