A comparison of two life stress assessment approaches: prospective prediction of treatment outcome in recurrent depression.
A comparison of two life stress assessment approaches: prospective prediction of treatment outcome in recurrent depression.
复制标题
两种生活压力评估方法的比较：复发性抑郁症治疗结果的前瞻性预测。
DOI：
10.1037//0021-843x.109.4.787
复制
发表时间：
2000
影响因子：
4.6
通讯作者：
Frank,E
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
McQuaid,JR;Monroe,SM;Roberts,JE;Kupfer,DJ;Frank,E
生活压力研究的特点是结果不一致，一些研究人员将其归因于不同的评估方法。一般来说，研究要么使用自我报告清单，要么使用基于调查者的访谈。为了测试这些方法是否会产生不同的结果，作者比较了来自自我报告的生活压力测量信息和来自随访调查人员的额外数据，以前瞻性地预测复发性重度抑郁症的治疗结果。这两种方法产生了不同的结果，基于调查者的生活事件预测缓解的可能性较低，而自我报告的生活事件要么预测缓解的可能性增加，要么根本没有预测。结果表明，方法可以解释生活压力文献中的一些不一致之处。（PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2022 APA，版权所有）
Research on life stress has been characterized by inconsistent results, which some researchers attribute to different assessment methodologies. Generally, studies have used either self-report checklists or investigator-based interviews. To test whether different results are derived from these approaches, the authors compared information from a self-report measure of life stress with the additional data available from a follow-up investigator-based measure in prospectively predicting the outcome of treatment for recurrent major depression. The 2 approaches produced different results, with investigator-based life events predicting lower probability of remission and self-report life events either predicting increased likelihood of remission or not predicting at all. The results demonstrated that methodology may account for some of the inconsistencies in the life stress literature.(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved)