A Social Movement Society?: A Cross-National Analysis of Protest Potential
A Social Movement Society?: A Cross-National Analysis of Protest Potential
复制标题
社会运动社会？：抗议潜力的跨国分析
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2008
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Andrew S. Fullerton
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Jenkins;M. Wallace;Andrew S. Fullerton
一些人认为，我们正在经历全球向“社会运动社会”的转变，在这种社会中，抗议是政治讨价还价的常规部分。后工业主义和富裕被视为与国家的增长和新社团主义的讨价还价相结合，创造了更大的抗议潜力。我们对1990年世界价值观调查中35个国家的41,235名受访者进行了多层次分析。净的抗议潜力的个人层面的来源的标准控制，我们发现，经济富裕，国家能力，妇女占总劳动力的百分比，和左社团主义有助于更大的总抗议潜力。经济歧视和新教徒比例造成的种族不满也起到了积极作用，而语言优势抑制了抗议潜力。抗议的可能性是后工业化趋势、新社团主义国家左翼政党的普遍控制战略以及长期存在的种族不满的产物。
Some argue that we are experiencing a global shift toward a "social movement society" in which protest is a routine part of political bargaining. Postindustrialism and affluence are seen as combining with the growth of the state and neocorporatist bargaining in creating greater protest potential. We use a multilevel analysis of 41,235 respondents nested within thirty-five countries from the 1990 World Values Survey to examine this question. Net of standard controls for individual-level sources of protest potential, we find that economic affluence, state capacity, women as a percentage of the total labor force, and left corporatism contribute to greater aggregate protest potential. Ethnic grievances stemming from economic discrimination and percentage of Protestants also contribute positively while language dominance suppresses protest potential. Protest potential is an outgrowth of postindustrialism trends, the prevailing control strategy of left parties in neocorporatist states, and long-standing ethnic grievances.