Evolution of molluscan hemocyanins as deduced from DNA sequencing.
Evolution of molluscan hemocyanins as deduced from DNA sequencing.
复制标题
根据 DNA 测序推断软体动物血蓝蛋白的进化。
DOI:
10.1016/j.micron.2003.10.035
复制
发表时间:
2004
期刊:
影响因子:
2.4
通讯作者:
J. Markl
中科院分区:
文献类型:
--
作者:
B. Lieb;J. Markl
Molluscan hemocyanins are huge cylindrical assemblies constructed from a 350–400 kDa polypeptide, the subunit, which is subdivided into 7 or 8 covalently-linked functional units (FUs, termed a to h) of ca. 50 kDa (for details, see Meissner et al., 2000). Each FU is able to reversibly bind a dioxygen molecule. This study is based on the sequence information of 13 hemocyanins (for their terminology, see Fig. 1) from four different animal classes of the phylum Mollusca. We calculated phylogenetic trees from multiple sequence alignments, using neighbour joining methods, maximum parsimony and the Baysian inference (Felsenstein, 1988; Kumar et al., 2001; Whelan and Goldman, 2001). All these trees resulted in a comparable topology of the individual functional units; an example is shown in Fig. 1. As already been observed by comparing HtH1 and OdH pairwise (Lieb et al., 2000), topologically corresponding FUs are also grouped together in the same branch of this broadened phylogenic tree. This further substantiates our earlier hypothesis that the gene encoding hemocyanin evolved from a primordial single FU gene (by three subsequent gene duplications and fusions), and that this occurred well before the phylum Mollusca split into its extant classes. Since an adequate outgroup is still lacking, the tree remains unrooted.Several of the molluscs studied exhibit two rather different hemocyanin isoforms, which almost certainly originated from duplication of a single eight-FU-gene. From the tree in Fig. 1 it is very clear that these duplication events occurred several times independently, because NnH1/NnH2 on the one hand and HtH1/HtH2/KLH1/KLH2 on the other are members of two different branches which are highly bootstrap-supported. A third branch is formed by RtH2e, indicating that also the duplication yielding the isoform pair RtH1/RtH2 occurred independently (Gebauer et al., 1999). Moreover, it is clear from