On The Politics of Exile
On The Politics of Exile
复制标题
论流亡政治
DOI：
--
复制
发表时间：
2013
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
Himadeep Muppidi
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Himadeep Muppidi
伊丽莎白·多菲尼的《流亡政治》的承诺最突出地在于它能够将我们从被困在殖民真理经济中的国际关系奖学金中驱逐出去。正是这种殖民真理的经济学，也可以读作欧洲，产生了一种国际关系学术和教育学，它不仅自觉地清除学术界的其他学习和认识方式，而且还在其接受者中引起冷漠或工具性取向。阅读Dauphinee的文本旁边的一个儿童被拘留者的审讯在关塔那摩湾的成绩单，以及Chinua Achebe的事情分崩离析，本文探讨了道德责任的关系，出现作为Dauphinee的小说开始移动作家，研究人员和国际关系教师远离经济的殖民真理。
The promise of Elizabeth Dauphinee’s The Politics Of Exile lies most prominently in its ability to exile us from an international relations scholarship trapped in an economy of colonial truth. It is this economy of colonial truth, also readable as Europe, that produces an international relations scholarship and pedagogy that not only self-consciously cleanses the academic world of other ways of learning and knowing but also induces an indifference or an instrumental orientation in its recipients. Reading Dauphinee’s text alongside the transcript of a child detainee’s interrogation in Guantánamo Bay as well as Chinua Achebe’s Things Fall Apart, this article explores the ethical relations of responsibility that emerge as Dauphinee’s novel sets out to move writers, researchers, and teachers of international relations away from an economy of colonial truth.