Laboratory stressors in clinically anxious and non-anxious individuals: The moderating role of mindfulness
Laboratory stressors in clinically anxious and non-anxious individuals: The moderating role of mindfulness
复制标题
DOI：
10.1016/j.brat.2010.02.005
复制
发表时间：
2010-06-01
影响因子：
4.1
通讯作者：
Craske, Michelle G.
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Arch, Joanna J.;Craske, Michelle G.
目的：正念形成了多种临床干预的基础，并已在实验室环境中诱导。然而，很少有研究探讨气质或特质正念的影响。本研究旨在探讨特质正念与实验室压力源反应的关系。我们假设，特质正念将与以上的贡献和抑郁相关的变量，并在更大程度上在高焦虑比低anxiety individual.Methods：90名参与者，包括46名焦虑症和44名非焦虑对照，减少压力源响应相关过度换气和放松压力源进行了评估。特质正念与压力源相关焦虑、负面情绪和持续时间的关系在分层多元回归模型中进行了研究。结果：特质正念在超过80%的测量结果中预测了压力源反应，在50%的结果中预测了高焦虑个体的更大程度。特质正念与临床焦虑和非焦虑样本对实验室压力源的反应减弱有关。情绪调节和临床干预的影响进行了讨论。(C)2010爱思唯尔有限公司版权所有。
Objective: Mindfulness forms the basis for multiple clinical interventions and has been induced in laboratory settings. However, few studies have examined the effects of dispositional or trait mindfulness. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship of trait mindfulness to laboratory stressor responding across fear-based anxiety disorder and non-anxious samples. We hypothesized that trait mindfulness would be associated with diminished stressor responding above and beyond the contribution of anxiety and depression-related variables, and to a greater extent in high anxiety than low anxiety individuals.Methods: 90 participants, including 46 with anxiety disorders and 44 non-anxious controls, were assessed on hyperventilation and relaxation stressors. The relationship of trait mindfulness to stressor-related anxiety, negative affect, and duration was investigated in a hierarchical multiple regression model.Results: Trait mindfulness predicted stressor responding in over 80% of measured outcomes, and predicted to a greater extent among high anxiety individuals in 50% of outcomes.Conclusions: Trait mindfulness was associated with diminished responses to laboratory stressors in clinically anxious and non-anxious samples. Implications for emotion regulation and clinical interventions are discussed. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.