The Institutional Economics of Karl Polanyi
The Institutional Economics of Karl Polanyi
复制标题
卡尔·波兰尼的制度经济学
DOI：
10.1080/00213624.1980.11503767
复制
发表时间：
1980
期刊：
影响因子：
--
通讯作者：
J. Stanfield
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
J. Stanfield
这篇文章的起因是，我坚信卡尔·波兰尼对制度经济学理论的贡献是巨大的，在很大程度上被实践的制度主义者忽视了。我对波兰尼的忽视的结论建立在偶然的经验主义基础上。他的名字很少在主要的制度主义期刊《经济问题杂志》中被提及，除了那些与波兰尼有直接私人关系的作家，如丹尼尔·福斯菲尔德、艾伦·西弗斯或乔治·道尔顿。类似地，波兰尼也没有出现在制度经济学的主要专著和书籍中，比如克拉伦斯·艾尔斯的《制度理论的阐述》、艾伦·格鲁西的《新制度主义调查》、大卫·汉密尔顿的《进化经济学概览》等。波兰尼甚至没有直接涉及他最感兴趣的问题的作品2我的论点将反过来考虑波兰尼作品中活生生的关注，他的一般途径或方法，以及他对现代资本主义的理论和解释。在最后一节，我认为他的贡献在当代具有重要意义。在讨论的每个阶段，我的目标是指出波兰尼的制度主义谱系。更具体地说，我试图确立他在以格鲁为特征的主流制度主义中的地位。
This article is prompted by my conviction that Karl Polanyi's contribution to institutional economic theory is substantial and largely neglected by practicing institutionalists. I base my conclusion about the neglect of Polanyi upon casual empiricism. His name is seldom mentioned in the major institutionalist periodical, the Journal of Economic Issues, except by those authors who had a direct, personal relationship with Polanyi, such as Daniel Fusfeld, Allen Sievers, or George Dalton. Polanyi is similarly absent from the major monographs and books on institutional economics, such as Clarence Ayres's articulation of institutional theory, Allan Gruchy's survey of neoinstitutionalism, David Hamilton's overview of evolutionary economics, and others.' Polanyi is not even indexed in works directly concerned with the problems to which he gave his predominant interest.2 My argument will consider, in turn, the animating concerns of Polanyi's work, his general approach or method, and his theory and interpretation of modern capitalism. In a final section, I suggest the contemporary importance of his contributions. In each phase of the discussion, it is my objective to indicate Polanyi's institutionalist pedigree. More specifically, I seek to establish his place within mainstream institutionalism as characterized by Gruchy.3 I am