Civil Disobedience-猫眼课题宝

公民抗命

DOI：

发表时间：

2017

期刊：

影响因子：

通讯作者：

中科院分区：

文献类型：

作者：

Lewis Perry

The philosophical discussion about civil disobedience has reached a curious juncture. On the one hand, there has been a wave of recent writing on the topic, which builds upon and updates the earlier explosion of philosophical interest triggered by the protest movements of the sixties and seventies (see, e.g. Brownlee, 2012; Smith, 2013). On the other hand, it is notable that much of this scholarship challenges civil disobedience, suggesting that philosophers should follow the lead of those activists who reject the label in favour of apparently more radical notions of ‘uncivil disobedience’ or ‘resistance’ (see, e.g. Brennan, 2018; Delmas, 2018). It is, then, difficult to determine if civil disobedience will remain central to philosophical debates and activist practice, or whether we are witnessing the beginnings of its decline. William E. Scheuerman’s critical analysis of civil disobedience, published as part of Polity’s influential Key Concepts series, therefore arrives at an auspicious moment. It offers an excellent, systematic survey of the philosophical literature on civil disobedience, as well as a nuanced appraisal of the profound impact of Gandhi and Martin Luther King, Jr on its theory and practice. Scheuerman maps the terrain through analysing the contrasting approaches to civil disobedience adopted by religious–spiritual (chapter 1), liberal (chapter 2), democratic (chapter 3) and anarchist (chapter 4) approaches. Although much of his discussion focuses on landmark contributions from previous eras, he also devotes considerable attention to recent developments. There is, for instance, a sharp overview of the state of current scholarship (chapter 7), informed by an impressive analysis of the transformative impacts of digitisation (chapter 6) and post-nationalisation (chapter 5) on the theory and practice of civil disobedience. The upshot is that the book functions as a superb primer on civil disobedience, which offers a one-stop resource for scholars, students and activists seeking an accessible guide to the literature. It would, though, be wrong to downplay the extent to which it constitutes an original and important contribution in its own right. If there is uncertainty about whether civil disobedience will continue to enjoy the