Introduction: MoHoA guest editorial

Introduction: MoHoA guest editorial
复制标题

简介:MoHoA 客座社论

DOI:
10.1111/cura.12585
复制
发表时间:
2024
期刊:
The Museum Journal
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
Denison E
Denison E
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
Denison E

文献摘要

参考文献

相似文献

本期特别版《人类现代遗产策展人》介绍了2022年10月26日至28日在英国伦敦大学学院巴特利特建筑学院与利物浦大学建筑学院合作举办的第二届莫霍亚国际会议。作为一个成立于2020年的全球合作组织,Mohoa致力于将现代遗产的理论和实践去中心化,并加入了更广泛的全球努力,以非殖民化的方式从事与我们最近的集体历史相关的物质文化的研究、收藏、估价或改造-从博物馆馆长和创意从业者到学者,以及建筑环境专业人员。基于这样一个事实,即我们岌岌可危的现在反映了不公平的过去和危险的未来,莫霍阿断言,现代遗产--就像它与西方的进步、现代化和现代性的概念密不可分--在概念上、实践上以及作为艺术品,都是独特的和不成比例的特权,西方的,总是白人的,经历和价值观。与其他类型或分类的遗产不同,现代遗产还反映了莫霍阿的核心存在论悖论,即我们最近过去的文化遗产既具有现代性,又受到其后果的威胁。通过其研讨会、会议、出版物和网站,Mohoa提供了一个分享知识、方法和途径的平台,这些知识、方法和途径挑战现代主义经典,并支持构建新的认识论,这些认识论不是以种族、肤色或民族为中心,而是以人类和我们在这个星球上自我造成的危险地位为中心。这种认知性和规范性的重新配置对全球博物馆和遗产实践具有重要影响,因为现代遗产及其相关的知识生产和登记模式的重建将指导藏品、名录和档案的组成不再神话化霸权的西方认知传统,而是反映偏向的地球经验,无论是人类的还是非人类的。这一集体的恢复工作的一个重要成果是出版了《关于现代遗产的开普敦文件》,该文件于2023年提交给教科文组织及其咨询机构,这是一项公平和有失偏颇的政策建议。
This special edition of Curator onModern Heritage in the Anthropocenedraws on the 2nd International MoHoA conference of the same title held from October 26 to 28, 2022, at The Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London (UK), in partnership with the University of Liverpool's School of Architecture. As a global collaborative established in 2020, MoHoA is concerned with decentring the theory and practice of modern heritage and joins the wider global effort to decolonize institutional practices that engage with the research, collection, valorization, or transformation of material culture associated with our collective recent past—from museum curators and creative practitioners to academics, and the built environment professions. Founded on the fact that our precarious present reflects an inequitable past and a perilous future, MoHoA asserts that modern heritage—inextricably bound as it is to Western notions of progress, modernization, and modernity—conceptually, practically, and as artifact, uniquely and disproportionately privileges western, invariably white, experiences and values. Unlike other kinds or classifications of heritage, modern heritage also reflects the existential paradox central to MoHoA whereby the cultural legacies of our recent past are simultaneously of modernity and yet threatened by its consequences. Through its workshops, conferences, publications, and website, MoHoA provides a platform for sharing knowledge, methods, and approaches that challenge the modernist canon and support the construction of new epistemologies centered not on race, color, or ethnicity but on humankind and our self‐inflicted precarious position on this planet. This epistemic and canonical reconfiguration has important implications for museums and heritage practice globally as the reconstitution of modern heritage and its associated modes of knowledge production and registers will direct the composition of collections, lists, and archives away from mythologizing hegemonic Western epistemic traditions, to reflect instead decentred planetary experiences, whether human or non‐human. An important outcome of this collective and restitutive endeavor is the publication ofThe Cape Town Document on Modern Heritage, an equitable and decentering policy proposal presented to UNESCO and its advisory bodies in 2023.
Achille Mbembe“知识非殖民化和档案问题”
DOI: --
发表时间: 2015
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Jenny Meurer
通讯作者: Jenny Meurer
欧洲地方化:后殖民思想和历史差异。
DOI: 10.1525/ae.2002.29.1.214
发表时间: 2002
影响因子: 2.3
作者:
D. Holmes
通讯作者: D. Holmes
现代遗产、他者和人类世
DOI: --
发表时间: 2018
期刊: Built heritage
影响因子: --
作者:
E. Denison
通讯作者: E. Denison
本土现代性:建筑与城市化的谈判
DOI: 10.1111/j.1531-314x.2010.01088.x
发表时间: 2010
影响因子: 0.2
作者:
W. Glover
通讯作者: W. Glover
DOI: --
发表时间: 2019
期刊:
影响因子: --
作者:
Achille Mbembe
通讯作者: Achille Mbembe