Incidence, risk factors, and dose-volume relationship of radiation-induced rib fracture after carbon ion radiotherapy for lung cancer

Incidence, risk factors, and dose-volume relationship of radiation-induced rib fracture after carbon ion radiotherapy for lung cancer
复制标题

DOI:
10.3109/0284186x.2015.1088169
复制
发表时间:
2016-02-01
期刊:
影响因子:
3.1
通讯作者:
Nakano, Takashi
Nakano, Takashi
中科院分区:
医学3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
Abe, Takanori;Shirai, Katsuyuki;Nakano, Takashi

文献摘要

被引文献

相似文献

背景资料:本研究的目的是评估肺癌碳离子放疗后放射性肋骨骨折(RIRF)的发生率、危险因素和剂量-体积关系。材料和方法:对18例接受碳离子放疗的周围I期非小细胞肺癌患者的57根肋骨进行肋骨骨折分析。患者接受总剂量52.8戈伊[相对生物学有效性(RBE)]或60.0戈伊(RBE)分4次治疗,并随访至少6个月。患者的特点和剂量学参数进行了分析与RIRF.Results:18例患者和57肋骨在这项研究中。中位随访时间为36.5个月。在18名患者中的7名(39%)和57根肋骨中的11名(19%)中观察到RIRF。只有1例患者出现症状性骨折。骨折肋骨与肿瘤部位的距离明显短于非骨折肋骨(1.4 ± 0.3cm vs. 2.5 ± 0.3cm)。受试者工作特征曲线分析表明,以D-1cm(3)作为判别RIRF的临界值,其曲线下面积最大(AUC=0.78)。根据截止值确定的两组中RIRF的两年累积发生率的比较得出以下结果:53% vs. 4% [D-1cm(3)>= 38.2戈伊(RBE)或更低]。两组结果有显著性差异(p
Background: The purpose of this study was to assess the incidence, risk factors, and dose-volume relationship of radiation-induced rib fracture (RIRF) after carbon ion radiotherapy for lung cancer.Material and methods: Fifty-seven ribs of 18 patients with peripheral stage I non-small cell lung cancer treated with carbon ion radiotherapy were analyzed on rib fracture. The patients were treated at a total dose of 52.8 Gy [relative biologic effectiveness (RBE)] or 60.0 Gy (RBE) in 4 fractions and were followed at least six months. Patient characteristics and dosimetric parameters were analyzed for associations with RIRF.Results: Eighteen patients and 57 ribs were included in this study. The median length of follow-up was 36.5 months. RIRF was observed in seven (39%) of the 18 patients, and in 11 (19%) of 57 ribs. Only one patient developed symptomatic fracture. The distance from the ribs to the tumor site was significantly shorter in fractured ribs than in non-fractured ribs (1.40.3cm vs. 2.5 +/- 0.3cm). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that D-1cm (3) as a cut-off value for discriminating RIRF had the largest area under the curve (AUC=0.78). Comparison of the two-year cumulative incidence of RIRF among two groups as determined by cut-off values, yielded the following result: 53% vs. 4% [D-1cm (3) >= 38.2 Gy (RBE) or less]. Results from the two groups were significantly different (p