Working Conditions, Work-Life Conflict, and Well-Being in UK Prison Officers: The Role of Affective Rumination and Detachment
Working Conditions, Work-Life Conflict, and Well-Being in UK Prison Officers: The Role of Affective Rumination and Detachment
复制标题
DOI：
10.1177/0093854816664923
复制
发表时间：
2017-02-01
影响因子：
2.1
通讯作者：
Hart, Jacqui
中科院分区：
文献类型：
--
作者：
Kinman, Gail;Clements, Andrew James;Hart, Jacqui
尽管监狱官员经历了与工作与生活冲突相关的工作条件，但很少有研究探讨这个问题。本研究利用工作-家庭资源模型来调查英国监狱官员的工作条件（攻击性需求和经历）与基于时间、基于压力和基于行为的工作与生活冲突之间的关系（N = 1,682）。还研究了工作条件、工作与生活冲突和情绪疲惫之间的关联。两种恢复行为（情感沉思和超然）被认为是工作条件和情绪耗竭之间关联的潜在调节因素。研究发现，所有工作与生活的冲突维度都很高，这与工作条件和情绪疲惫有关。一些证据发现，较高的沉思和较低的超然性加剧了工作要求与攻击性和情绪耗竭之间的正相关关系。讨论了研究结果对监狱官员的福祉和专业运作的影响，以及未来研究的关键领域。
Although prison officers experience working conditions associated with work-life conflict, little research has explored this issue. This study draws upon the work-home resources model to investigate relationships between working conditions (demands and experiences of aggression) and time-based, strain-based, and behavior-based work-life conflict in U.K. prison officers (N = 1,682). Associations between working conditions, work-life conflict, and emotional exhaustion were also examined. Two recovery behaviors (affective rumination and detachment) were considered as potential moderators of associations between working conditions and emotional exhaustion. High levels of all work-life conflict dimensions were found, which were related to working conditions and emotional exhaustion. Some evidence was found that higher rumination and lower detachment exacerbated the positive association between both job demands and aggression and emotional exhaustion. The implications of the findings for the well-being and professional functioning of prison officers are discussed, together with key areas for future research.