A computational study of creativity in design: The role of society

A computational study of creativity in design: The role of society
复制标题

设计创造力的计算研究:社会的作用

DOI:
--
复制
发表时间:
2005
期刊:
Artificial intelligence for engineering design, analysis and manufacturing
影响因子:
--
通讯作者:
J. Gero
J. Gero
中科院分区:
--
文献类型:
--
作者:
R. Sosa;J. Gero

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

创造力的研究往往集中在孤立的个体上,假设它可以被定义为一个非凡的人、产品或过程的特征。现有的创造性行为计算模型继承了这种对独立生成过程的强调。然而,越来越多的多学科共识将创造力视为一种系统属性,并将探究的焦点扩展到包括生成个体和评估社会群体之间的相互作用。为了承认社会团体、专家和同行评估过程的互补性,本文提出了将设计框架作为一种社会活动的实验。这个模型被用来检查设计师和他们的社会之间的互动中与创造力有关的现象。特别是,本文将社会联系的强度描述为社会组织的一种机制,并在计算社会模拟中探索其与创造力的潜在关系。这些实验表明,设计师作为社会变革推动者的角色在很大程度上取决于评估群体随着时间的推移如何自我组织。一个关键的潜在暗示是,设计师的孤立特征可能不足以形成关于其行为的性质和影响的结论。相反,因果关系可以归因于定义设计师和评估者之间关系的情境因素。
Studies of creativity have tended to focus on isolated individuals, under the assumption that it can be defined as a characteristic of an extraordinary person, product, or process. Existing computational models of creative behavior have inherited this emphasis on independent generative processes. However, an increasing multidisciplinary consensus regards creativity as a systems property, and extends the focus of inquiry to include the interaction between generative individuals and evaluative social groups. To acknowledge the complementarity of evaluative processes by social groups, experts, and peers, this paper presents experimentation with a framework of design as a social activity. This model is used to inspect phenomena associated with creativity in the interaction between designers and their societies. In particular, this paper describes the strength of social ties as a mechanism of social organization, and explores its potential relation to creativity in a computational social simulation. These experiments illustrate ways in which the role of designers as change agents of their societies can be largely determined by how the evaluating group self-organizes over time. A key potential implication is that the isolated characteristics of designers may be insufficient to formulate conclusions about the nature and effects of their behavior. Instead, causality could be attributed to situational factors that define the relationship between designers and their evaluators.
DOI: --
发表时间: 1999
期刊: --
影响因子: --
作者:
Nigel Gi lbert;K. G. Troitzsch
通讯作者: Nigel Gi lbert;K. G. Troitzsch