Exploring the expectations of transport professionals concerning the future automobility system: Visions, challenges, and transitions

Exploring the expectations of transport professionals concerning the future automobility system: Visions, challenges, and transitions
复制标题

探索交通专业人士对未来汽车系统的期望:愿景、挑战和转型

DOI:
10.1080/15568318.2016.1275891
复制
发表时间:
2017
影响因子:
3.9
通讯作者:
Giulio Mattioli
Giulio Mattioli
中科院分区:
工程技术3区
文献类型:
--
作者:
C. Morton;T. Budd;G. Harrison;Giulio Mattioli

文献摘要

参考文献

被引文献

相似文献

摘要 技术、商业结构和社会实践方面潜在的重大变化目前正在进入汽车系统。这些变化有可能结合在一起,并导致社会燃料、拥有和使用汽车的方式发生重大转变。本文报道了一个研究项目,该项目利用焦点小组来研究英国交通专业人士对汽车系统即将发展的叙述。特别关注的是对汽车未来变化的期望是什么,这些变化是否可能导致向更可持续的系统过渡,以及促进这种性质的过渡的方式。使用主题分析对焦点小组期间提供的口头证词进行定性评估。结果表明,人们普遍认为汽车系统正在进入一个变化的阶段,这可能会导致系统配置发生相当大的变化。然而,系统可持续转型的实现可能会受到一系列制度、社会和物理障碍的阻碍,这些障碍可能会限制系统的发展。
ABSTRACT A mixture of potentially significant changes in technology, commercial structures, and social practices is currently entering the automobility system. These changes have the potential to combine together and lead to a substantial shift in the manner in which society fuels, owns, and makes use of its cars. This paper reports a research project that made use of focus groups to examine the narratives of British transport professionals concerning forthcoming developments in the automobility system. Specific attention was given to what the expectations for future change in automobility are, if these changes will likely lead to a transition toward a more sustainable system and the manner in which a transition of this nature could be facilitated. The oral testimony offered during the focus groups has been assessed qualitatively using thematic analysis. The results suggest that there is a commonly held view that the automobility system is entering a stage of flux, which may lead to considerable changes in system configuration. However, the attainment of a sustainable transition for the system will likely be inhibited by a series of institutional, societal, and physical barriers, which may restrict system developments.
流动性、交通和社会包容:历史教训
DOI: 10.17645/si.v4i3.461
发表时间: 2016
期刊: Social Inclusion
影响因子: 1.5
作者:
Pooley C
通讯作者: Pooley C